Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Having published work does not, in itself, make an academic notable, no matter how many publications there are. Notability depends on the impact the work has had on the field of study. This notability guideline specifies criteria for judging the notability of an academic through reliable sources for the impact of their work.
Notability The basic requirement for a topic to have its own article is: significant coverage in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. significant coverage means that sources address the subject directly in detail, so no original research is needed to extract the content. Significant coverage is more than a ...
High quality research can be published in low-circulation journals, just as poor research may be published in widely read journals. Major journals are likely to have more readily available verifiable information from reliable sources that provide evidence of notability; however, smaller journals also can be notable if they can be considered to ...
The criteria applied to the creation or retention of an article are not the same as those applied to the content inside it. The notability guideline does not apply to the contents of articles. It also does not apply to the contents of stand-alone lists, unless editors agree to use notability as part of the list selection criteria.
The general notability guideline creates a presumption of notability. The presumption (or assumption) is that a topic that has received significant coverage in independent, reliable sources should have a Wikipedia article written about it. An editor may show that the presumption may not apply to a topic through the deletion process. Other ...
Notability once conferred is perpetual, unless the thresholds for notability as defined in Wikipedia:Notability are changed or the assessment of notability was flawed. Once sources exist they do not simply go away even if they become old, generally forgotten, superseded, or hard to find. The notability demonstrated by those sources persists.
Title: Editors may use their discretion to merge or group two or more related topics into a single article. Guidelines outline how suitable a topic is for its own article or list . Promotional material : Content is considered at the reviewers discretion to determine whether it has promotional content or reads like an advertisement.
"A correlate to this notability criterion, crucial to the identity of the site, is the prohibition on original research, including the synthesis of previously published material." [ 2 ] As the Wikipedia community has grown, its rules have in turn become more complex, a trend known as instruction creep . [ 5 ]