When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. South Carolina v. Katzenbach - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Carolina_v._Katzenbach

    South Carolina v. Katzenbach, 383 U.S. 301 (1966), was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court that rejected a challenge from the state of South Carolina to the preclearance provisions of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, which required that some states submit changes in election districts to the Attorney General of the United States (at the time, Nicholas Katzenbach). [1]

  3. List of landmark court decisions in the United States

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_landmark_court...

    South Carolina v. Katzenbach, 383 U.S. 301 (1966) The Voting Rights Act of 1965 is a valid exercise of Congress's power under Section 2 of the Fifteenth Amendment. Katzenbach v. Morgan, 384 U.S. 641 (1966) Congress may enact laws stemming from Section 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment that increase the rights of citizens beyond what the judiciary ...

  4. South Carolina in the civil rights movement - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Carolina_in_the...

    In the Supreme Court decision of South Carolina v. Katzenbach (1966), Justice Earl Warren authored in the majority opinion that preventing racial discrimination was a "legitimate response" of Congress and that South Carolina's intentions were generated from "insidious and pervasive evil". [38]

  5. Early voting is biggest expansion of voting rights in recent ...

    www.aol.com/news/early-voting-biggest-expansion...

    For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us

  6. Voting Rights Act of 1965 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voting_Rights_Act_of_1965

    In South Carolina v. Katzenbach (1966) the Supreme Court also held that Congress had the power to pass the Voting Rights Act of 1965 under its Enforcement Powers stemming from the Fifteenth Amendment: Congress exercised its authority under the Fifteenth Amendment in an inventive manner when it enacted the Voting Rights Act of 1965. First: the ...

  7. JFK files: J. Edgar Hoover said public must believe Lee ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/2017-10-27-jfk-files-j-edgar...

    Katzenbach is known from previously released documents to have shared Hoover's concern, writing in a memo the next day, on Nov. 25, 1963, that "the public must be satisfied that Oswald was the ...

  8. Louisiana, Arizona end pauses on capital punishment as 3 ...

    www.aol.com/louisiana-arizona-end-pauses-capital...

    South Carolina to execute fourth person in five months. Meanwhile the South Carolina Supreme Court on Friday scheduled a March 7 execution date for Brad Sigmon for the 2001 murder of a couple and ...

  9. Katzenbach - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Katzenbach

    South Carolina v. Katzenbach, 1966 case which rejected a challenge by the state of South Carolina to the preclearance provisions of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, which required that some states submit changes in election districts to the Attorney General of the United States (at the time, Nicholas Katzenbach).