Ads
related to: acts 2 explained simply
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Acts 2 is the second chapter of the Acts of the Apostles in the New Testament of the Christian Bible. The book containing this chapter is anonymous but early Christian tradition asserted that Luke composed this book as well as the Gospel of Luke . [ 1 ]
The name "Acts of the Apostles" was first used by Irenaeus in the late 2nd century. It is not known whether this was an existing name for the book or one invented by Irenaeus; it does seem clear that it was not given by the author, as the word práxeis (deeds, acts) only appears once in the text (Acts 19:18) and there it refers not to the apostles but to deeds confessed by their followers.
The mortalist view of the intermediate state requires an alternative view of the Acts 2:27 and Acts 2:31, taking a view of the New Testament use of Hell as equivalent to use of Hades in the Septuagint and therefore to Sheol in the Old Testament. [33] William Tyndale and Martin Bucer of Strassburg argued that Hades in Acts 2 was merely a ...
Wedderburn acknowledges the possibility of a ‘mass ecstatic experience’, [54] and notes it is difficult to explain why early Christians later adopted this Jewish festival if there had not been an original Pentecost event as described in Acts. [55] He also holds the description of the early community in Acts 2 to be reliable. [56] [57]
The Acts of the Apostles (or the Book of Acts, or simply Acts) is the fifth book of the Christian New Testament. Following immediately after Jesus’s crucifixion, the book tells of the founding of the Christian Church and the spread of its message beyond Israel. [2] [3]
Khloé Kardashian's Christmas Eve plans are being put on hold. The Good American co-founder, 40, shared a photo on her Instagram Stories, writing that she and her two kids — Tatum, 2, and True ...
You'll never find someone who loves Ragdoll cats like one woman does. The vet tech was so excited when she saw there was a Ragdoll on the schedule for that day.
Wedderburn acknowledges the possibility of a ‘mass ecstatic experience’, [44] and notes it is difficult to explain why early Christians later adopted this Jewish festival if there had not been an original Pentecost event as described in Acts. [45] He also holds the description of the early community in Acts 2 to be reliable. [46] [47]