Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
When a prime occurs multiple times, exponentiation can be used to group together multiple copies of the same prime number: for example, in the second way of writing the product above, denotes the square or second power of
The exponent of the group, that is, the least common multiple of the orders in the cyclic groups, is given by the Carmichael function (sequence A002322 in the OEIS). In other words, λ ( n ) {\displaystyle \lambda (n)} is the smallest number such that for each a coprime to n , a λ ( n ) ≡ 1 ( mod n ) {\displaystyle a^{\lambda (n)}\equiv 1 ...
If the algebraic group is the multiplicative group mod N, the one-sided identities are recognised by computing greatest common divisors with N, and the result is the p − 1 method. If the algebraic group is the multiplicative group of a quadratic extension of N, the result is the p + 1 method; the calculation involves pairs of numbers modulo N.
The multiplicative order of a number a modulo n is the order of a in the multiplicative group whose elements are the residues modulo n of the numbers coprime to n, and whose group operation is multiplication modulo n. This is the group of units of the ring Z n; it has φ(n) elements, φ being Euler's totient function, and is denoted as U(n) or ...
n, and is called the group of units modulo n, or the group of primitive classes modulo n. As explained in the article multiplicative group of integers modulo n, this multiplicative group (× n) is cyclic if and only if n is equal to 2, 4, p k, or 2 p k where p k is a power of an odd prime number.
In mathematics, specifically group theory, given a prime number p, a p-group is a group in which the order of every element is a power of p.That is, for each element g of a p-group G, there exists a nonnegative integer n such that the product of p n copies of g, and not fewer, is equal to the identity element.
If an AP-k does not begin with the prime k, then the common difference is a multiple of the primorial k# = 2·3·5·...·j, where j is the largest prime ≤ k. Proof: Let the AP-k be a·n + b for k consecutive values of n. If a prime p does not divide a, then modular arithmetic says that p will divide every p'th term of the arithmetic ...
Since no prime number divides 1, p cannot be in the list. This means that at least one more prime number exists that is not in the list. This proves that for every finite list of prime numbers there is a prime number not in the list. [4] In the original work, Euclid denoted the arbitrary finite set of prime numbers as A, B, Γ. [5]