When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Court_of...

    Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Judgeship and Reorganization Act of 2017, H.R. 196 [24] The more recent proposals have aimed to redefine the Ninth Circuit to cover California, Hawaii, Guam, and the Northern Mariana Islands, and to create a new Twelfth Circuit to cover Alaska, Arizona, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, and Washington.

  3. Standard of review - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_of_review

    Additionally, in some areas of substantive law, such as when a court is reviewing a First Amendment issue, an appellate court will use a standard of review called "independent review." [citation needed] The standard is somewhere in between de novo review and clearly erroneous review. Under independent review, an appellate court will reexamine ...

  4. Ninth Circuit rules in favor of federal deportation - AOL

    www.aol.com/ninth-circuit-rules-favor-federal...

    The Ninth Circuit panel affirmed the district court’s summary judgment that the order violated the Supremacy Clause and the Instrument of Transfer agreement.

  5. United States courts of appeals - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_courts_of...

    The circuit with the fewest appellate judges is the First Circuit, and the one with the most appellate judges is the geographically large and populous Ninth Circuit in the West. The number of judges that the U.S. Congress has authorized for each circuit is set forth by law in 28 U.S.C. § 44 , while the places where those judges must regularly ...

  6. Intermediate scrutiny - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intermediate_scrutiny

    Intermediate scrutiny may be contrasted with "strict scrutiny", the higher standard of review that requires narrowly tailored and least restrictive means to further a compelling governmental interest, and "rational basis review", a lower standard of review that requires the law or policy be rationally related to a legitimate government interest.

  7. Elk Grove Unified School District v. Newdow - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elk_Grove_Unified_School...

    Elk Grove Unified School District v. Newdow, 542 U.S. 1 (2004), was a case decided by the U.S. Supreme Court. [1] The lawsuit, originally filed as Newdow v. United States Congress, Elk Grove Unified School District, et al. in 2000, led to a 2002 ruling by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit that the words "under God" in the Pledge of Allegiance are an endorsement of ...

  8. Danielle J. Forrest - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Danielle_J._Forrest

    Danielle Jo Forrest (born June 24, 1977 [1] [2]), formerly known as Danielle Jo Hunsaker, is a United States circuit judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Forrest was previously an Oregon state court judge for the Washington County Circuit Court from 2017 to 2019.

  9. Silveira v. Lockyer - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silveira_v._Lockyer

    The Ninth Circuit refused to hear the case en banc but issued a set of dissenting opinions to the denial to take the case en banc, which included a notable opinion by Judge Alex Kozinski. [3] The U.S. Supreme Court denied review, [4] despite the decision conflicting with the holding of the Fifth Circuit in United States v. Emerson. [5]