When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kumho_Tire_Co._v._Carmichael

    Daubert Standard, Federal Rule of Evidence 702 Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael , 526 U.S. 137 (1999), is a United States Supreme Court case that applied the Daubert standard to expert testimony from non-scientists.

  3. Federal Rules of Evidence - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Rules_of_Evidence

    First adopted in 1975, the Federal Rules of Evidence codify the evidence law that applies in United States federal courts. [1] In addition, many states in the United States have either adopted the Federal Rules of Evidence, with or without local variations, or have revised their own evidence rules or codes to at least partially follow the federal rules.

  4. Daubert standard - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daubert_standard

    Rule 702 originally stated (in its entirety), If scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or determine a fact in issue, a witness qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education, may testify thereto in the form of an opinion or otherwise.

  5. Frye standard - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frye_standard

    Download QR code; Print/export ... The court must determine that the scientific evidence is ... the courts have generally adopted Rule 702 of the Federal Rules of ...

  6. Expert witness - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expert_witness

    An expert testifying in a United States federal court must satisfy the requirements of Fed. R. Evid. 702. [1] Generally, under Rule 702, an expert is a person with "scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge" who can "assist the trier of fact," which is typically a jury.

  7. Prior consistent statements and prior inconsistent statements

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prior_consistent...

    Note that under California Evidence Code ("CEC") §§769, 770, and 1235, prior inconsistent statements may be used for both impeachment and as substantive evidence, even if they were not originally made under oath at a formal proceeding, as long as "the witness was so examined while testifying as to give him an opportunity to explain or to deny ...

  8. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daubert_v._Merrell_Dow...

    Rule 702 of the Federal Rules of Evidence provides (in part): If scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue, a witness qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education, may testify thereto in the form of an opinion ...

  9. FISA of 1978 Amendments Act of 2008 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FISA_of_1978_Amendments...

    Section 702 certifications are authorized annually. There are some differences from the traditional Title I FISA process. The certifications are authorized based on categories of information that are subject to the collection and meet the definition of foreign intelligence information.