Ad
related to: ogx scandal hair products reviews scam bbb complaints problems
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
“[The products] have a chemical called DMDM hydantoin, which is a base component in formaldehyde,” read a Facebook post with over 15,000 shares. “It can cause scalp irritation and hair loss a
The Better Business Bureau just released some good news: In 2011, consumers consulted the BBB far more often than they did the year before, and they lodged fewer complaints. Surely that's a sign ...
With a legacy of more than 100 years, the Better Business Bureau (BBB) is the go-to watchdog for evaluating businesses and charities. The nonprofit organization maintains a massive database of ...
The Rio Hair Naturalizer System was a hair relaxer distributed by the World Rio Corporation Inc. It was available in two types; "Neutral", and one that claimed to have a "Color Enhancement Formula" that contained a black hair dye. [1] As a product designed for home use, it was promoted through infomercials in the early to mid-1990s.
One of the largest internet based consumer-review services, Rateitall.com reports the average consumer review of Comcast as 1.6 out of 5 stars, based on a total of 511 reviews to date (2014). [7] Consumer affairs blog The Consumerist named Comcast "Worst Company in America" in 2010 and 2014. [8]
Wen was at the center of a class-action lawsuit which alleged that the product had caused damage to hair after use. [5] [6] In March 2016, the FDA opened an investigation into complaints about Wen Hair Care products by consumers. [7] In October 2016, Wen agreed to settle out of court for a total of $26 million without admitting any wrongdoing. [8]
For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us
The review found that the "principal factual finding" of the report was "reasonably substantiated by the evidence presented," but that the report had a number of shortcomings, including overstating the legal interpretation that Ukrainian forces has violated humanitarian law, using "ambiguous, imprecise and in some respects legally questionable ...