Ads
related to: breach of promise laws nevada sample of affidavit of residence example legal
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Breach of promise is a common-law tort, abolished in many jurisdictions. It was also called breach of contract to marry , [ 1 ] and the remedy awarded was known as heart balm . From at least the Middle Ages to the early 20th century, many jurisdictions regarded a man's promise of engagement to marry a woman as a legally binding contract .
The Cecily Jordan v.Greville Pooley dispute was the first known prosecution for breach of promise in colonial America and the first in which the defendant was a woman. [1]: 29 June 1623 [2]: 107–108 This case was tried in the chambers of the Virginia Company, and never went to a civil court, for the plaintiff withdrew his complaint.
Inducing a breach of contract was a tort of accessory liability, and an intention to cause a breach of contract was a necessary and sufficient requirement for liability; a person had to know that he was inducing a breach of contract and to intend to do so; that a conscious decision not to inquire into the existence of a fact could be treated as ...
Where allowed, such an endorsement gives the document the same weight as an affidavit, per 28 U.S.C. § 1746 [2] The document is called a sworn declaration or sworn statement instead of an affidavit, and the maker is called a "declarant" rather than an "affiant", but other than this difference in terminology, the two are treated identically by ...
The test is that set out for repudiatory breach, above. The concept of fundamental breach as a free standing legal concept no longer has any legal force [26] but is now simply another possible term of a contract that needs to be construed like any other term of a contract. A fundamental breach is usually read as a reference to a repudiatory ...
In certain jurisdictions, breach of the implied covenant can also give rise to a tort action, e.g. A.C. Shaw Construction v. Washoe County, 105 Nevada 913, 915, 784 P.2d 9, 10 (1989). [4] This rule is most prevalent in insurance law, when the insurer's breach of the implied covenant may give rise to a tort action known as insurance bad faith.