Ads
related to: montana supreme court opinions and orders public informationcourtrec.com has been visited by 100K+ users in the past month
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Montana’s Supreme Court on Wednesday upheld a 2023 ruling siding with young climate activists who asserted the state government violated their right to a healthy environment. In August 2023 ...
The Montana Supreme Court upheld a landmark trial court decision in favor of 16 young people who said their health and futures were being jeopardized by climate change that the state aggravates ...
Montana's Supreme Court has upheld a lower court's decision that had sided with 16 young activists who argued that the state violated their right to a clean environment. The lawsuit was brought by ...
Baxter v. Montana, is a Montana Supreme Court case, argued on September 2, 2009, and decided on December 31, 2009, that addressed the question of whether the state's constitution guaranteed terminally ill patients a right to lethal prescription medication from their physicians.
By statute, all decisions of the Montana Supreme Court must be in writing, and must set forth the grounds of the decision. [25] However, it is up to the court to decide whether an unelaborated order or a full opinion is appropriate. [26] If a full opinion is to be issued, its drafting is assigned to a justice during conference.
The families petitioned to the United States Supreme Court for review, seeking review of the Montana Supreme Court's decision to terminate the program on the basis of the Religion Clauses or Equal Protection Clause. The Supreme Court granted certiorari in June 2019. [6] Oral arguments were heard on January 22, 2020.
HELENA, Mont. (AP) — Montana’s Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that minors don’t need their parents’ permission to get an abortion in the state – agreeing with a lower court ruling that ...
Several justices on the seven-member Montana Supreme Court appeared skeptical of the Republican-led state's contention that the 16 young people in the case lacked legal standing to challenge a ...