When.com Web Search

  1. Ad

    related to: positive freedom vs negative examples of leadership characteristics

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Two Concepts of Liberty - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two_Concepts_of_Liberty

    Berlin initially defined negative liberty as "freedom from", that is, the absence of constraints on the agent imposed by other people. He defined positive liberty both as "freedom to", that is, the ability (not just the opportunity) to pursue and achieve willed goals; and also as autonomy or self-rule, as opposed to dependence on others.

  3. Positive liberty - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Positive_liberty

    Positive liberty is the possession of the power and resources to act in the context of the structural limitations of the broader society which impacts a person's ability to act, as opposed to negative liberty, which is freedom from external restraint on one's actions.

  4. Leadership style - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leadership_style

    Examples of authoritarian leadership include a police officer directing traffic, a teacher ordering a student to do their assignment, and a supervisor instructing a subordinate to clean a workstation. All of these positions require a distinct set of characteristics that give the leader the position to get things in order or to get a point across.

  5. How Kamala Harris Took 'Freedom' From the Republicans - AOL

    www.aol.com/kamala-harris-took-freedom...

    It was the philosopher Isaiah Berlin who first made the distinction between positive freedomfreedom to—versus negative freedom, freedom from. Positive freedom is the ability to exercise ...

  6. Negative and positive rights - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negative_and_positive_rights

    Shue further maintains that the negative and positive rights distinction can be harmful, because it may result in the neglect of necessary duties. [8] James P. Sterba makes similar criticisms. He holds that any right can be made to appear either positive or negative depending on the language used to define it. He writes:

  7. Transformational leadership - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transformational_leadership

    This leads to subordinates having a free hand in deciding policies and methods. Studies have shown that while transformational leadership styles are associated with positive outcomes, laissez-faire leadership is associated with negative outcomes, especially in terms of follower satisfaction with leader and leader effectiveness. [27]

  8. Leadership - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leadership

    The authoritarian leadership style, for example, is approved in periods of crisis but fails to win the "hearts and minds" of followers in day-to-day management; the democratic leadership style is more adequate in situations that require consensus building; finally, the laissez-faire leadership style is appreciated for the degree of freedom it ...

  9. Negative liberty - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negative_liberty

    He proposed dialectical positive liberty as a means to gaining both negative and positive liberty, by overcoming the inequalities that divide us. According to Taylor, positive liberty is the ability to fulfill one's purposes, while negative liberty is the freedom from interference by others. [9]