When.com Web Search

  1. Ad

    related to: upper bounds of functions graph theory ppt slides

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Bound graph - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bound_graph

    In graph theory, a bound graph expresses which pairs of elements of some partially ordered set have an upper bound.Rigorously, any graph G is a bound graph if there exists a partial order ≤ on the vertices of G with the property that for any vertices u and v of G, uv is an edge of G if and only if u ≠ v and there is a vertex w such that u ≤ w and v ≤ w.

  3. Upper and lower bounds - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Upper_and_lower_bounds

    Similarly, a function g defined on domain D and having the same codomain (K, ≤) is an upper bound of f, if g(x) ≥ f (x) for each x in D. The function g is further said to be an upper bound of a set of functions, if it is an upper bound of each function in that set.

  4. Boundary (graph theory) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boundary_(graph_theory)

    In graph theory, the outer boundary of a subset S of the vertices of a graph G is the set of vertices in G that are adjacent to vertices in S, but not in S themselves. The inner boundary is the set of vertices in S that have a neighbor outside S.

  5. Lovász number - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lovász_number

    In graph theory, the Lovász number of a graph is a real number that is an upper bound on the Shannon capacity of the graph. It is also known as Lovász theta function and is commonly denoted by (), using a script form of the Greek letter theta to contrast with the upright theta used for Shannon capacity.

  6. Zorn's lemma - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zorn's_lemma

    If T is the empty set, then {v} is an upper bound for T in P. Suppose then that T is non-empty. We need to show that T has an upper bound, that is, there exists a linearly independent subset B of V containing all the members of T. Take B to be the union of all the sets in T. We wish to show that B is an upper bound for T in P.

  7. Zarankiewicz problem - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zarankiewicz_problem

    Therefore, if one can show a lower bound for (/,;,) that matches the upper bound up to a constant, then by a simple sampling argument (on either an / bipartite graph or an / bipartite graph that achieves the maximum edge number), we can show that for all ,, one of the above two upper bounds is tight up to a constant.

  8. Topological graph - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Topological_graph

    The first linear upper bound on the number of edges of such a graph was established by Lovász et al. [3] The best known upper bound, 1.3984n, was proved by Fulek and Pach. [4] Apart from geometric graphs, Conway's thrackle conjecture is known to be true for x-monotone topological graphs. [5]

  9. Join and meet - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Join_and_meet

    If (,) is a partially ordered set, such that each pair of elements in has a meet, then indeed = if and only if , since in the latter case indeed is a lower bound of , and since is the greatest lower bound if and only if it is a lower bound. Thus, the partial order defined by the meet in the universal algebra approach coincides with the original ...