Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
If it meets the criteria, it is added to the list of good articles below. There are instructions for nominators and reviewers. Similarly, anyone who believes that an article no longer meets the good article criteria may propose to delist it by following the instructions for reassessment. More good content is available at Wikipedia:Good topics
Well-written: the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct; and; it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. [1] Verifiable with no original research: [2]
well-written: its prose is engaging and of a professional standard; comprehensive : it neglects no major facts or details and places the subject in context; well-researched : it is a thorough and representative survey of the relevant literature; claims are verifiable against high-quality reliable sources and are supported by inline citations ...
Additional research is usually necessary to write a great article. A great article has to be verifiable and cite reliable sources which ideally should include books or peer-reviewed journal articles. Consider visiting a university or public library to identify and study the best sources.
Either way, a literature review is supposed to provide the researcher/author and the audiences with a general image of the existing knowledge on the topic under question. A good literature review can ensure that a proper research question has been asked and a proper theoretical framework and/or research methodology have been chosen. To be ...
Well-written, clear, well referenced Coverage is the main criterion in assessing Stub, Start and C class articles, but truly awful prose or severe technical issues can drag a rating down to Stub. With B and GA/A/FA, where coverage is mostly complete, quality of prose and technical style are more important.
Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!
This page in a nutshell: Cite reviews, don't write them. Appropriate sources for discussing the natural sciences include comprehensive reviews in independent, reliable published sources, such as recent peer reviewed articles in reputable scientific journals, statements and reports from reputable expert bodies, widely recognized standard textbooks written by experts in a field, or standard ...