When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. File:Section 377 - Supreme Court of India - WP(C) NO. 76 OF ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Section_377_-_Supreme...

    English: A landmark ruling of the hon'ble Supreme court of India overturning its own verdict on Suresh Kumar Koushal vs. Naz Foundation case. The court unanimously declared section 377 criminalizing homosexual acts as unconstitutional and repealed some of portions of the same, hence declaring all private consensual sexual acts between adults legal.

  3. Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Navtej_Singh_Johar_v...

    The petitioners were dancer Navtej Singh Johar, journalist Sunil Mehra, chef Ritu Dalmia, hoteliers Aman Nath and Keshav Suri, and businesswoman Ayesha Kapur. [5] This case was the first instance wherein the petitioners argued that they had all been directly aggrieved because of Section 377, alleging it to be a direct violation of fundamental ...

  4. Section 377 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Section_377

    This judgement was believed to imply the unconstitutionality of section 377. [19] [20] [21] In January 2018, the Supreme Court agreed to hear a petition to revisit the 2013 Naz Foundation judgment. On 6 September 2018, the Court ruled unanimously in Navtej Singh Johar v.

  5. LGBTQ rights in India - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBTQ_rights_in_India

    However, on 4 February 2021, the Allahabad High Court ruled that firing and discriminating against a person in employment on the basis of sexual orientation is a violation of Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India ruling of the Supreme Court, hence extending the anti-discriminatory provisions to employment everywhere.

  6. Supriyo v. Union of India - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supriyo_v._Union_of_India

    To make their case, they point to the Supreme Court ruling in Navtej Singh Johar v. UOI (2018) that explicitly differentiated and excluded marital relationships while reading down Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code for violating fundamental rights. They argue that the Supreme Court decriminalised homosexual conduct but did not legitimise it.

  7. S. J. Mukhopadhaya - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S._J._Mukhopadhaya

    Download as PDF; Printable version; ... the judgement was overturned by a 5-judge constitutional bench on 6 September 2018 in Navtej Singh Johar v.

  8. List of landmark court decisions in India - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_landmark_court...

    This judgement thus overruled the ADM Jabalpur v. Shivkant Shukla (1976): [17] A person's right to not be unlawfully detained (i.e. habeas corpus) can be suspended during emergency. Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India [18] 2018 Decriminalisation of acts of Oral sex and Anal sex which effectively decriminalised Homosexual sex.

  9. Navtej Johar - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Navtej_Johar

    In June 2016, Johar and five others, belonging to sexual and gender minority community, filed a writ petition in the Supreme Court of India challenging Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code. [8] This resulted in the 2018 landmark judgment in Navtej Singh Johar v.