When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Mental chronometry - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mental_chronometry

    Nevertheless, the study of conscious accompaniments in the context of reaction time was an important historical development in the late 1800s and early 1900s. For example, Wundt and his associate Oswald Külpe often studied reaction time by asking participants to describe the conscious process that occurred during performance on such tasks. [8]

  3. C1 and P1 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C1_and_P1

    In an experiment by Mangun and Hillyard, they had had participants do a size discrimination task between two bars, one on the left and one on the right with the target stimuli either being the smaller or taller bars, depending on the block of trials. A cue was given before each pair of blocks was given. This cue was only correct 75% of the time.

  4. Stimulus–response compatibility - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stimulus–response...

    Stimulus–response (S–R) compatibility is the degree to which a person's perception of the world is compatible with the required action. S–R compatibility has been described as the "naturalness" of the association between a stimulus and its response, such as a left-oriented stimulus requiring a response from the left side of the body.

  5. Simon effect - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simon_effect

    The reaction time increased by as much as 30%. [4] However, what is usually seen as the first genuine demonstration of the effect that became known as the Simon effect is by Simon & Rudell (1967). [5] Here, they had participants respond to the words "left" and "right" that were randomly presented to the left or right ear.

  6. Reaction time - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/?title=Reaction_time&redirect=no

    This page was last edited on 27 September 2021, at 15:25 (UTC).; Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License; additional terms may apply.

  7. Divided visual field paradigm - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Divided_visual_field_paradigm

    Since saccadic latencies to a lateralized stimulus can be as fast as 150ms following stimulus onset, the lateralized stimulus should only be presented for a duration of 180ms at most. [ 2 ] A free software tool called the "Lateralizer" has been developed for piloting and conducting customizable experiments using the divided visual field paradigm.

  8. Inspection time - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inspection_time

    Inspection time refers to the exposure duration required for a human subject to reliably identify a simple stimulus. Typically a stimulus made up of two parallel lines differing in length and joined at the tops by a cross bar is presented (similar to the Greek letter Pi ).

  9. Jensen box - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jensen_box

    Simple reaction time correlates with general cognitive ability, [4] and there is some evidence that the slope of responding on the Jensen box does as well. [2] Ian Deary and colleagues, in a population-based cohort study of 900 individuals, demonstrated correlations between IQ and simple choice RTs between –0.3 and –0.5. [ 4 ]