When.com Web Search

  1. Ad

    related to: vicarious liability vs respondeat superior premium income statement form

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Vicarious liability - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vicarious_liability

    Vicarious liability is a form of a strict, secondary liability that arises under the common law doctrine of agency, respondeat superior, the responsibility of the superior for the acts of their subordinate or, in a broader sense, the responsibility of any third party that had the "right, ability, or duty to control" the activities of a violator.

  3. Qui facit per alium facit per se - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qui_facit_per_alium_facit...

    The maxim is a shortened form of the fuller 18th-century formulation: qui facit per alium, est perinde ac si facit per se ipsum: "whoever acts through another acts as if he were doing it himself." Indirectly, the principle is in action or present in the duty that has been represented by the agent so the duty performed will be seen as the ...

  4. Negligence in employment - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negligence_in_employment

    While negligence in employment may overlap with negligent entrustment and vicarious liability, the concepts are distinct grounds of liability. The doctrine that an employer is liable for torts committed by employees within the scope of their employment is called respondeat superior.

  5. Respondeat superior - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Respondeat_superior

    Respondeat superior (Latin: "let the master answer"; plural: respondeant superiores) is a doctrine that a party is responsible for (and has vicarious liability for) acts of his agents. [ 1 ] : 794 For example, in the United States, there are circumstances when an employer is liable for acts of employees performed within the course of their ...

  6. Secondary liability - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secondary_liability

    Although the line between these categories of liability is blurry, a precondition for all forms of secondary liability is the underlying act (or acts) of infringement. However, unlike contributory infringement, knowledge is not an element of vicarious liability. 907 F. Supp. 1361, **36, citing 3 NIMMER ON COPYRIGHT § 12.04{A}{1}, at 12-70 (1995)

  7. Vicarious liability in English law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vicarious_liability_in...

    Morris v CW Martin & Sons Ltd, [59] for example establishes vicarious liability of thefts by an employee, where there is a non-delegable duty to keep the claimant's possessions safe. [60] However, the scope of such liability was limited to torts committed in the course of employment, under the second limb of Salmond's course of employment test.

  8. Outline of tort law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outline_of_tort_law

    Vicarious liability – A form of strict secondary liability arising from respondeat superior. The responsibility of the superior for the acts of their subordinates, under which, they are responsible for negligent acts committed by their employees during the course of their employment. [2]

  9. Employment contract - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Employment_contract

    Lawsuits can arise as well from Respondeat Superior Liability or vicarious liability. Respondeat Superior is the legal doctrine that in Latin means “let the master answer." Respondeat Superior holds an employer legally responsible for the wrongful acts of an employee or agent if such acts occur within the scope of the employment or agency.