When.com Web Search

  1. Ad

    related to: false claims act fca 31 usc §§ 3729 3733 e gulf

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Fraud Enforcement and Recovery Act of 2009 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fraud_Enforcement_and...

    This amendment is in reaction to the Supreme Court's 2008 decision in Allison Engine Co. v. United States ex rel. Sanders, in which the Court held that the mere involvement of Federal money was insufficient to bring a fraudulent claim or invoice within the scope of the False Claims Act. The amended subsection (a) of 31 U.S.C. § 3729 ...

  3. Qui tam - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qui_tam

    The False Claims Act (31 U.S.C. §§ 37293733, also called the "Lincoln Law") is an American federal law that was passed on March 2, 1863 during the American Civil War, that allows people who are not affiliated with the government to file actions against federal contractors claiming fraud against the government. The law represented an effort ...

  4. False Claims Act of 1863 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_Claims_Act_of_1863

    The False Claims Act of 1863 (FCA) [1] is an American federal law that imposes liability on persons and companies (typically federal contractors) who defraud governmental programs. It is the federal government's primary litigation tool in combating fraud against the government. [ 2 ]

  5. Public Law 99-562 99th Congress An Act

    highline.huffingtonpost.com/miracleindustry/...

    An Act To amend title 31, United States Code, with respect to the fraudulent use of public property or money. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the "False Claims Amendments Act of 1986". SEC. 2. FALSE CLAIMS.

  6. Allison Engine Co. v. United States ex rel. Sanders - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allison_Engine_Co._v...

    Allison Engine Co. v. United States ex rel.Sanders, 553 U.S. 662 (2008), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States holding that plaintiffs under the False Claims Act must prove that the false claim was made with the specific intent of inducing the government to pay or approve payment of a false or fraudulent claim, rather than merely defrauding a contractor. [1]

  7. United States ex rel. Eisenstein v. City of New York - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_ex_rel...

    The False Claims Act provides: (b) Actions by private persons … (1) A person may bring a civil action for a violation of section 3729 [31 U.S.C. § 3729] for the person and for the United States Government. The action shall be brought in the name of the Government. —

  8. Title 31 of the United States Code - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Title_31_of_the_United...

    31 U.S.C. ch. 37: Claims; 31 U.S.C. ch. 38: Administrative Remedies for False Claims and Statements; 31 U.S.C. ch. 39: Prompt Payment: this chapter provides for interest penalties where a federal agency does not pay a business concern's invoice by its due date.

  9. List of off-label promotion pharmaceutical settlements

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_off-label...

    Parke-Davis, under the False Claims Act in federal district court in Boston. In the first off-label promotion case ever litigated in a whistleblower suit under the False Claims Act, the settlement was announced after eight years of litigation in May 2004.