When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Wikipedia:Reliable sources - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources

    Sites with user-generated content include personal websites, personal and group blogs (excluding newspaper and magazine blogs), content farms, Internet forums, social media sites, fansites, video and image hosting services, most wikis and other collaboratively created websites. Examples of unacceptable user-generated sources are Ancestry.com ...

  3. Wikipedia : Potentially unreliable sources

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Potentially...

    Examples of such promotional journals include Creation Research Society Quarterly, Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, and Homeopathy. Be aware of predatory publishers, for example journals published by OMICS Publishing Group. These are very unlikely to be accepted as reliable sources.

  4. Wikipedia:Reliable source examples - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_source...

    Posts on Usenet are rarely regarded as reliable sources, because they are easily forged or misrepresented, and many are anonymous or pseudonymous.. One exception is that some authorities on certain topics have written extensively on Usenet, and their writings there are vouched for by them or by other reliable sources.

  5. Wikipedia : Identifying and using self-published works

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Identifying_and...

    Examples of self-published sources. Almost all websites except for those published by traditional publishers (such as news media organizations), including: Blogs; Web forums; Wikis; Social networking sites like Facebook, Myspace, Twitter, and LinkedIn; Sites with user-generated content, including YouTube, Tik Tok, and Find A Grave

  6. Wikipedia : Reliable sources checklist

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources...

    Matters unrelated to their writing such as sex scandals might or might not indicate anything. Awards and accolades might matter some, depending on the source, but it's probably best to avoid giving much importance to man-of-the-year type logrolling.

  7. Wikipedia:Verifiability - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Verifiability

    But when editors discuss sources (for example, to debate their appropriateness or reliability) the word source has four related meanings: The work itself (the article, book) and works like it ("An obituary can be a useful biographical source", "A recent source is better than an old one")

  8. Credibility - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Credibility

    Credibility dates back to Aristotle's theory of Rhetoric.Aristotle defines rhetoric as the ability to see what is possibly persuasive in every situation. He divided the means of persuasion into three categories, namely Ethos (the source's credibility), Pathos (the emotional or motivational appeals), and Logos (the logic used to support a claim), which he believed have the capacity to influence ...

  9. Wikipedia talk:Reliable sources - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Reliable...

    Meaning of these sentences: The DSM-5 might be an excellent source in theory – scholarly reference work, heavily cited by other sources, etc. – but it is absolutely unreliable if you're trying to support a sentence that says "Oppenheimer (film) won the Academy Award for Best Picture". OTOH, for that same sentence, a self-published, non ...