When.com Web Search

  1. Ad

    related to: how to test convergent validity in psychology

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Multitrait-multimethod matrix - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multitrait-multimethod_matrix

    The Sawilowsky I test, [5] [6] however, considers all of the data in the matrix with a distribution-free statistical test for trend. Example of a MTMM measurement model . The test is conducted by reducing the heterotrait-heteromethod and heterotrait-monomethod triangles, and the validity and reliability diagonals, into a matrix of four levels.

  3. Convergent validity - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convergent_validity

    Convergent validity, along with discriminant validity, is a subtype of construct validity. Convergent validity can be established if two similar constructs correspond with one another, while discriminant validity applies to two dissimilar constructs that are easily differentiated. Campbell and Fiske (1959) developed the Multitrait-Multimethod ...

  4. Construct validity - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Construct_validity

    Construct validity examines the question: Does the measure behave like the theory says a measure of that construct should behave? Construct validity is essential to the perceived overall validity of the test. Construct validity is particularly important in the social sciences, psychology, psychometrics and language studies.

  5. Psychological statistics - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_statistics

    Construct validity is estimated by convergent and discriminant validity and factor analysis. Convergent and discriminant validity are ascertained by correlation between similar of different constructs. Content Validity: Subject matter experts evaluate content validity. Criterion Validity is correlation between the test and a criterion variable ...

  6. Validity (statistics) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Validity_(statistics)

    The validity of a measurement tool (for example, a test in education) is the degree to which the tool measures what it claims to measure. [3] Validity is based on the strength of a collection of different types of evidence (e.g. face validity, construct validity, etc.) described in greater detail below.

  7. Concurrent validity - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concurrent_validity

    Concurrent validity is a type of evidence that can be gathered to defend the use of a test for predicting other outcomes. It is a parameter used in sociology, psychology, and other psychometric or behavioral sciences. Concurrent validity is demonstrated when a test correlates well with a measure that has previously been validated. The two ...

  8. Confirmatory factor analysis - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confirmatory_factor_analysis

    It is used to test whether measures of a construct are consistent with a researcher's understanding of the nature of that construct (or factor). As such, the objective of confirmatory factor analysis is to test whether the data fit a hypothesized measurement model. This hypothesized model is based on theory and/or previous analytic research. [2]

  9. Criterion validity - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criterion_validity

    [3] Criterion validity is typically assessed by comparison with a gold standard test. [ 4 ] An example of concurrent validity is a comparison of the scores of the CLEP College Algebra exam with course grades in college algebra to determine the degree to which scores on the CLEP are related to performance in a college algebra class. [ 5 ]