Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Equivalent statement 2: x n + y n = z n, where integer n ≥ 3, has no non-trivial solutions x, y, z ∈ Q. This is because the exponents of x, y, and z are equal (to n), so if there is a solution in Q, then it can be multiplied through by an appropriate common denominator to get a solution in Z, and hence in N.
Two other solutions are x = 3, y = 6, z = 1, and x = 8, y = 9, z = 2. There is a unique plane in three-dimensional space which passes through the three points with these coordinates, and this plane is the set of all points whose coordinates are solutions of the equation.
The Fredholm alternative is the statement that, for every non-zero fixed complex number, either the first equation has a non-trivial solution, or the second equation has a solution for all (). A sufficient condition for this statement to be true is for K ( x , y ) {\displaystyle K(x,y)} to be square integrable on the rectangle [ a , b ] × [ a ...
The two-state solution is supported by many countries, and the Palestinian Authority. [1] Israel currently does not support the idea, though it has in the past. [2] The first proposal for separate Jewish and Arab states in the territory was made by the British Peel Commission report in 1937. [3]
An animation of the solution. His actions in the solution are summarized in the following steps: Take the goat over; Return empty-handed; Take the wolf or cabbage over; Return with the goat; Take whichever wasn't taken in step 3 over; Return empty-handed; Take the goat over; There are seven crossings: four forward and three back.
So, if one starts from a solution in terms of radicals, one gets an increasing sequence of fields such that the last one contains the solution, and each is a normal extension of the preceding one with a Galois group that is cyclic. Conversely, if one has such a sequence of fields, the equation is solvable in terms of radicals.
Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!
In mathematics, a proof by infinite descent, also known as Fermat's method of descent, is a particular kind of proof by contradiction [1] used to show that a statement cannot possibly hold for any number, by showing that if the statement were to hold for a number, then the same would be true for a smaller number, leading to an infinite descent and ultimately a contradiction. [2]