When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. List of Runge–Kutta methods - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Runge–Kutta_methods

    All are implicit methods, have order 2s − 2 and they all have c 1 = 0 and c s = 1. Unlike any explicit method, it's possible for these methods to have the order greater than the number of stages. Unlike any explicit method, it's possible for these methods to have the order greater than the number of stages.

  3. Finite difference coefficient - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Finite_difference_coefficient

    The coefficients given in the table above correspond to the latter definition. The theory of Lagrange polynomials provides explicit formulas for the finite difference coefficients. [ 4 ] For the first six derivatives we have the following:

  4. Fraction - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fraction

    6 1 2 1 11 4 5 9. and would be written in modern notation as 61 / 4 ⁠, 11 / 5 ⁠, and 2 − ⁠ 1 / 9 ⁠ (i.e., 18 / 9 ⁠). The horizontal fraction bar is first attested in the work of Al-Hassār (fl. 1200), [35] a Muslim mathematician from Fez, Morocco, who specialized in Islamic inheritance jurisprudence.

  5. Runge–Kutta methods - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Runge–Kutta_methods

    For example, a two-stage method has order 2 if b 1 + b 2 = 1, b 2 c 2 = 1/2, and b 2 a 21 = 1/2. [8] Note that a popular condition for determining coefficients is [ 8 ] ∑ j = 1 i − 1 a i j = c i for i = 2 , … , s . {\displaystyle \sum _{j=1}^{i-1}a_{ij}=c_{i}{\text{ for }}i=2,\ldots ,s.}

  6. Simpson's rule - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simpson's_rule

    Composite Simpson's 3/8 rule is even less accurate. Integration by Simpson's 1/3 rule can be represented as a weighted average with 2/3 of the value coming from integration by the trapezoidal rule with step h and 1/3 of the value coming from integration by the rectangle rule with step 2h. The accuracy is governed by the second (2h step) term.

  7. Polynomial decomposition - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polynomial_decomposition

    The first algorithm for polynomial decomposition was published in 1985, [6] though it had been discovered in 1976, [7] and implemented in the Macsyma/Maxima computer algebra system. [8] That algorithm takes exponential time in worst case, but works independently of the characteristic of the underlying field .

  8. Harmonic progression (mathematics) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harmonic_progression...

    In it, uniform blocks are stacked on top of each other to achieve the maximum sideways or lateral distance covered. The blocks are stacked 1/2, 1/4, 1/6, 1/8, 1/10, … distance sideways below the original block. This ensures that the center of gravity is just at the center of the structure so that it does not collapse.

  9. Irreducible fraction - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irreducible_fraction

    For example, ⁠ 1 / 4 ⁠, ⁠ 5 / 6 ⁠, and ⁠ −101 / 100 ⁠ are all irreducible fractions. On the other hand, ⁠ 2 / 4 ⁠ is reducible since it is equal in value to ⁠ 1 / 2 ⁠, and the numerator of ⁠ 1 / 2 ⁠ is less than the numerator of ⁠ 2 / 4 ⁠. A fraction that is reducible can be reduced by dividing both the numerator ...