Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Coolidge v. New Hampshire, 403 U.S. 443 (1971), was a United States Supreme Court case dealing with the Fourth Amendment and the automobile exception.. The state sought to justify the search of a car owned by Edward Coolidge, suspected of killing 14-year-old Pamela Mason in January 1964, on three theories: automobile exception, search incident to arrest and plain view.
A similar offence known as taking and driving away exists in Scotland. It is an offence under section 178 of the Road Traffic Act 1988 to take and drive away a motor vehicle without the consent of the owner or, knowing the vehicle has been taken, to drive it or be carried in it. [4]
The work was done by a New Hampshire Revision Commission, which describes what it did at the start of each volume of the RSA, and was ratified in 1955 by statute. A predecessor of Thomson West acquired the business of publishing the RSA from Equity Publishing Corp., founded by former governor Meldrim Thomson Jr.
Financial Protection: In the unfortunate event of an accident while someone else is driving your car with your permission, permissive use can be a lifesaver. Your insurance may cover property ...
Arthur Richard Marple, commonly known as Richard Marple or simply Dick Marple (March 4, 1931 – December 13, 2019), was a Republican member of the New Hampshire House of Representatives [1] from the town of Hooksett. He served six terms in that body prior to his death in December 2019. [2]
New Hampshire law enforcement officials are increasing efforts to reduce youth driving fatalities as new data reveals a staggering 400% increase in deaths among drivers under 21.. State Police Lt ...
The law of New Hampshire is the state law of the U.S. state of New Hampshire. It consists of the Constitution of the State of New Hampshire , as well as the New Hampshire Revised Statutes Annotated , the New Hampshire Code of Administrative Rules , and precedents of the state courts.
The plaintiff may have to show that the family member who was using the vehicle received express permission to do so if the owner made the vehicle available to family members only with express permission. However, the fact that the owner required family members to have special or express permission to use the vehicle does not, in and of itself ...