Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
For example, the union of three sets A, B, and C contains all elements of A, all elements of B, and all elements of C, and nothing else. Thus, x is an element of A ∪ B ∪ C if and only if x is in at least one of A, B, and C. A finite union is the union of a finite number of sets; the phrase does not imply that the union set is a finite set ...
The union of two intervals is an interval if and only if they have a non-empty intersection or an open end-point of one interval is a closed end-point of the other, for example (,) [,] = (,]. If R {\displaystyle \mathbb {R} } is viewed as a metric space , its open balls are the open bounded intervals ( c + r , c − r ) , and its closed balls ...
The open sets and closed sets of any topological space are closed under both unions and intersections. [1] On the real line R, the family of sets consisting of the empty set and all finite unions of half-open intervals of the form (a, b], with a, b ∈ R is a ring in the measure-theoretic sense.
Any union of elements of τ is an element of τ; Any intersection of finitely many elements of τ is an element of τ; If τ is a topology on X, then the pair (X, τ) is called a topological space. The notation X τ may be used to denote a set X endowed with the particular topology τ. The members of τ are called open sets in X.
The algebra of sets is the set-theoretic analogue of the algebra of numbers. Just as arithmetic addition and multiplication are associative and commutative, so are set union and intersection; just as the arithmetic relation "less than or equal" is reflexive, antisymmetric and transitive, so is the set relation of "subset".
By De Morgan's laws, the complement of the intersection is a union of two disjoint open sets. By the connectedness of the real line there must be something between them. This shows that the intersection of (even an uncountable number of) nested, closed, and bounded intervals is nonempty.
To investigate the left distributivity of set subtraction over unions or intersections, consider how the sets involved in (both of) De Morgan's laws are all related: () = = () always holds (the equalities on the left and right are De Morgan's laws) but equality is not guaranteed in general (that is, the containment might be strict).
The answer seems to be every possible . When is empty, the condition given above is an example of a vacuous truth. So the intersection of the empty family should be the universal set (the identity element for the operation of intersection), [4] but in standard set theory, the universal set does not exist.