When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Edwards v. Vannoy - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edwards_v._Vannoy

    Edwards v. Vannoy , 593 U.S. ___ (2021), was a United States Supreme Court case involving the Court's prior decision in Ramos v. Louisiana , 590 U.S. ___ (2020), which had ruled that jury verdicts in criminal trials must be unanimous under the Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution .

  3. List of overruled United States Supreme Court decisions

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_overruled_United...

    The longest period between the original decision and the overruling decision is 136 years, for the common law Admiralty cases Minturn v. Maynard , 58 U.S. (17 How.) 476 decision in 1855, overruled by the Exxon Corp. v. Central Gulf Lines Inc. , 500 U.S. 603 decision in 1991.

  4. Martinez v. Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martinez_v._Court_of...

    Martinez v. Court of Appeal of California, 528 U.S. 152 (2000), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court decided an appellant who was the defendant in a criminal case cannot refuse the assistance of counsel on direct appeals. This case is in contrast to Faretta v.

  5. Vinson & Elkins - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vinson_&_Elkins

    Vinson & Elkins LLP (or V&E) is an international law firm with approximately 700 lawyers worldwide [1] headquartered in Downtown Houston, Texas. [2] [3]The firm has offices in major energy, financial, and political centers worldwide, including Austin, Dallas, Denver, Dubai, Dublin, Houston, London, Los Angeles, New York City, Richmond, San Francisco, Tokyo, and Washington, D.C.

  6. Ramos v. Louisiana - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ramos_v._Louisiana

    Thedrick Edwards, a different Louisiana inmate convicted by a 10-to-2 decision, had been challenging Louisiana's non-unanimous jury conviction law since his own 2007 conviction, had petitioned to the Supreme Court around the same time that Ramos had been under consideration, using collateral review (Ramos dealt with direct review). [12]

  7. Compulsory Process Clause - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compulsory_Process_Clause

    However, in Taylor v. Illinois (1988), the Court rejected a challenge to witness preclusion rules, holding that the Clause did not provide for an "absolute" right for defendants. [ 13 ] The Court held that "The Compulsory Process Clause provides [the defendant] with an effective weapon, but it is a weapon that cannot be used irresponsibly". [ 14 ]

  8. Talk:Edwards v. Vannoy - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Edwards_v._Vannoy

    Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us; Donate

  9. List of Saturday Night Live commercial parodies - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Saturday_Night...

    Gandhi and the Bandit – A movie trailer spoofing Smokey and the Bandit, with law enforcement chasing a speeding 18-wheeler driven by Mahatma Gandhi (Tim Kazurinsky). [265] Gangsta Bitch Barbie — A parody of the use of hip hop culture in advertisements promotes a new Barbie doll that perpetuates stereotypes of black people living in the ghetto.