Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
In numerical analysis, a quasi-Newton method is an iterative numerical method used either to find zeroes or to find local maxima and minima of functions via an iterative recurrence formula much like the one for Newton's method, except using approximations of the derivatives of the functions in place of exact derivatives.
Second, all local maxima that have height lower or equal to a given threshold are suppressed. The height f of the remaining maxima is decreased by h {\displaystyle h} . The h-maxima transform is defined as the reconstruction by dilation of f {\displaystyle f} from f − h {\displaystyle f-h} :
Perhaps the best-known example of the idea of locality lies in the concept of local minimum (or local maximum), which is a point in a function whose functional value is the smallest (resp., largest) within an immediate neighborhood of points. [1]
Once DoG images have been obtained, keypoints are identified as local minima/maxima of the DoG images across scales. This is done by comparing each pixel in the DoG images to its eight neighbors at the same scale and nine corresponding neighboring pixels in each of the neighboring scales.
Local maximum at x = −1− √ 15 /3, local minimum at x = −1+ √ 15 /3, global maximum at x = 2 and global minimum at x = −4. For a practical example, [ 6 ] assume a situation where someone has 200 {\displaystyle 200} feet of fencing and is trying to maximize the square footage of a rectangular enclosure, where x {\displaystyle x} is ...
Global optimization is distinguished from local optimization by its focus on finding the minimum or maximum over the given set, as opposed to finding local minima or maxima. Finding an arbitrary local minimum is relatively straightforward by using classical local optimization methods. Finding the global minimum of a function is far more ...
The result, θ = 4.56/D, with D in inches and θ in arcseconds, is slightly narrower than calculated with the Rayleigh criterion. A calculation using Airy discs as point spread function shows that at Dawes' limit there is a 5% dip between the two maxima, whereas at Rayleigh's criterion there is a 26.3% dip. [3]
The Lagrange multiplier theorem states that at any local maximum (or minimum) of the function evaluated under the equality constraints, if constraint qualification applies (explained below), then the gradient of the function (at that point) can be expressed as a linear combination of the gradients of the constraints (at that point), with the ...