Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
A humorous variant of Gödel's ontological proof is mentioned in Quentin Canterel's novel The Jolly Coroner. [26] [page needed] The proof is also mentioned in the TV series Hand of God. [specify] Jeffrey Kegler's 2007 novel The God Proof depicts the (fictional) rediscovery of Gödel's lost notebook about the ontological proof. [27]
Versions of the story can also be found in Logical Dilemmas: The Life and Work of Kurt Gödel (1997) By John W. Dawson; E: His Life, His Thought and His Influence on Our Culture (2006), edited by Donald Goldsmith and Marcia Bartusiak; Incompleteness: The Proof and Paradox of Kurt Gödel (2006) by Rebecca Goldstein; Godel: A Life Of Logic, The ...
Moreover, one may define a statement form Proof(x,y), which for every two numbers x and y is provable if and only if x is the Gödel number of a proof of the statement S and y = G(S). Proof(x,y) is in fact an arithmetical relation, just as "x + y = 6" is, though a much more complicated one.
The application is a defense of Christianity stating that "If God does not exist, the Atheist loses little by believing in him and gains little by not believing. If God does exist, the Atheist gains eternal life by believing and loses an infinite good by not believing". [3] The atheist's wager has been proposed as a counterargument to Pascal's ...
In mathematical logic, Rosser's trick is a method for proving a variant of Gödel's incompleteness theorems not relying on the assumption that the theory being considered is ω-consistent (Smorynski 1977, p. 840; Mendelson 1977, p. 160).
Kurt Gödel (1925) The proof of Gödel's completeness theorem given by Kurt Gödel in his doctoral dissertation of 1929 (and a shorter version of the proof, published as an article in 1930, titled "The completeness of the axioms of the functional calculus of logic" (in German)) is not easy to read today; it uses concepts and formalisms that are no longer used and terminology that is often obscure.
Many logicians believe that Gödel's incompleteness theorems struck a fatal blow to David Hilbert's second problem, which asked for a finitary consistency proof for mathematics. The second incompleteness theorem, in particular, is often viewed as making the problem impossible.
In which case it is no longer anything like Godel's proof, and no longer carries even the level of certainty Godel's proof carries, because there is no evidence that the property "exists" is necessary for a thing that is incompatible with God to possess, while in Godel's proof, if you accept that "exists" is a positive property and that God ...