When.com Web Search

  1. Ads

    related to: sample response to summary judgment motion timeline california

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Writ of mandate (California) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Writ_of_mandate_(California)

    The petitioner must arrange for the lodging of the administrative record, and then, depending upon local rules, get the petition onto the court's motion calendar for a hearing and ruling on its merits by way of an ex parte application for an order to show cause or a motion for writ of administrative mandate. The superior court either holds oral ...

  3. Summary judgment - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Summary_judgment

    [9] 71% of summary-judgment motions were filed by defendants, 26% by plaintiffs. [9] Out of these, 36% of the motions were denied, and 64% were granted in whole or in part. [9] Civil rights cases concluded in U.S. district courts, by disposition, 1990–2006. [10] From a tactical perspective, there are two basic types of summary-judgment motions.

  4. Federal Rules of Civil Procedure - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Rules_of_Civil...

    Rule 56 deals with summary judgment. It is considered the last gate-keeping function before trial, answering the question of whether the claim could even go to a jury. A successful summary judgment motion persuades the court there is no "genuine issue of material fact" and also that the moving party is "entitled to judgment as a matter of law."

  5. Motion (legal) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motion_(legal)

    Motions to dismiss and motions for summary judgment are types of dispositive motions. Rule 56, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, is the rule which explains the mechanics of a summary judgment motion. As explained in the notes to this rule, summary judgment procedure is a method for promptly disposing of actions in which there is no genuine ...

  6. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Celotex_Corp._v._Catrett

    Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317 (1986), was a case decided by the United States Supreme Court.Written by Associate Justice William Rehnquist, the decision of the Court held that a party moving for summary judgment need show only that the opposing party lacks evidence sufficient to support its case.

  7. Dispositive motion - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dispositive_motion

    Regardless whether the dispositive motion is for summary judgment or adjudication, the motion must be supported by declarations under oath, excerpts from depositions which are also under oath, admissions of fact by the opposing party and other discovery such as interrogatories, as well as a legal argument (points and authorities). The other ...