When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Brown v. United States (2024) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brown_v._United_States_(2024)

    Brown v. United States, (Docket Nos. 22-6389 and 22–6640), is a United States Supreme Court case about the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA). The Supreme Court affirmed both courts of appeals, holding that a state drug conviction counts as an ACCA predicate if it involved a drug on the federal schedules at the time of that conviction.

  3. Brooke Group Ltd. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brooke_Group_Ltd._v._Brown...

    Brooke Group Ltd. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 509 U.S. 209 (1993), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court required that an antitrust plaintiff alleging predatory pricing must show not only changes in market conditions adverse to its interests, as a threshold matter, but must show on the merits that (1) the prices complained of are below an appropriate measure of its ...

  4. Davis v. County School Board of Prince Edward County

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Davis_v._County_School...

    Davis v. County School Board of Prince Edward County (Docket number: Civ. A. No. 1333; Case citation: 103 F. Supp. 337 (1952)) was one of the five cases combined into Brown v. Board of Education, the famous case in which the U.S. Supreme Court, in 1954, officially overturned racial segregation in U.S. public schools. The Davis case was the only ...

  5. Oppo Neo 5 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oppo_Neo_5

    The Oppo Neo 5 is the 3rd phone in the Oppo Neo Series. It is also known by the alias Oppo Neo 5 (4G) to distinguish it from other variants of the Neo 5 (Oppo Neo 5 (2015), Oppo Neo 5s). One of the selling points of the phone, as mentioned by the phones' official website, is a "Double-layer Metallic Structure" which Oppo claims gives the phone ...

  6. Brown v. Allen - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brown_v._Allen

    In two of the cases Speller v. Crawford (99 F. Supp 92) and Daniels v. Crawford (99 F. Supp. 208) the district court heard new evidence in addition to the trial and appellate records. In Brown v. Crawford (98 F. Supp. 866) the district court accepted the findings of the sentencing judge without considering new evidence. [5]

  7. Charles Black (professor) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Black_(professor)

    In 1947, he became a professor of law at the Columbia University Law School, where he wrote legal briefs for the successful 1954 Brown v. Board of Education suit. He also was involved in civil rights cases in the south. [3] In 1956, he joined Yale Law School as its first Henry R. Luce Professor of Jurisprudence. He was appointed Sterling ...

  8. Simple Justice - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simple_Justice

    Simple Justice: The History of Brown v. Board of Education and Black America's Struggle for Equality , written by Richard Kluger and published by Alfred A. Knopf in two volumes 1975 and in a single-volume edition in 1976, [ 1 ] [ 2 ] was a finalist for the 1977 National Book Award in the History category. [ 3 ]

  9. Black & White Taxicab & Transfer Co. v. Brown & Yellow ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_&_White_Taxicab...

    Brown and Yellow Taxicab and Transfer Company, 276 U.S. 518 (1928), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court refused to hold that federal courts sitting in diversity jurisdiction must apply state common law. Ten years later, in Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins, the Court reversed course, and overturned Swift v. Tyson.