Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Labor organizations filed lawsuits and took other actions in an attempt to stop the furloughs of state workers. [9] On Jan. 29, 2009, a Superior Court Judge ruled that Schwarzenegger had emergency furlough power, and on February the 3rd District Court of Appeal in Sacramento said the appeal to the decision came too late and was incomplete, so judges were unable to determine if a halt to state ...
Former Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger forced state workers to take as many as three furlough days a month following the Great Recession, reducing their pay by about 15%. The move sparked a multi-year ...
The last time the state faced a large deficit in 2020, Newsom used a furlough-like program to cut state worker pay for a year, giving public employees two days of paid leave per month in exchange.
By 2008, PECG-represented employees received pay raises to bring their salaries in line with their counterparts in California's large local public agencies. State budget deficits, [5] [6] furloughs, [7] [8] and wasteful outsourcing [9] [10] are among the many challenges facing PECG and the members.
California Refinery and Chemical Plant Worker Safety Act of 1990 added section 7872 and 7873 to the Labor Code. On September 25, 1992, AB 2601 was signed into law. [20] It protected gays and lesbians against employment discrimination. [21] California was the seventh state to add sexual orientation to laws barring job discrimination. [22]
The state already suspended its popular leave buy-back program as part of an “expenditure freeze” to cut costs. Newsom proposes cutting California state employee telework stipends due to ...
Get The State Worker Bee newsletter in your inbox every Wednesday. This is a preview of our weekly state worker newsletter. Subscribers receive more exclusive tidbits like this one, as well as a ...
California Assembly Bill 5 or AB 5 is a state statute that expands a landmark Supreme Court of California case from 2018, Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. Superior Court ("Dynamex"). [1] In that case, the court held that most wage-earning workers are employees and ought to be classified as such, and that the burden of proof for classifying ...