Ad
related to: hazard ratio examples
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The hazard ratio is the effect on this hazard rate of a difference, such as group membership (for example, treatment or control, male or female), as estimated by regression models that treat the logarithm of the HR as a function of a baseline hazard () and a linear combination of explanatory variables:
For example, the hazard ratio of company 5 to company 2 is (()) =. This means that, within the interval of study, company 5's risk of "death" is 0.33 ≈ 1/3 as large as company 2's risk of death. There are important caveats to mention about the interpretation:
An example is the bathtub curve hazard function, which is large for small values of , decreasing to some minimum, and thereafter increasing again; this can model the property of some mechanical systems to either fail soon after operation, or much later, as the system ages.
If the ratio is closer to 5-to-1, for example, 1 inch of water may be equivalent to 5 inches of snow, which means that your roof can reach the danger zone if total snow accumulation passes 2 feet ...
This approach performs well for certain measures and can approximate arbitrary hazard functions relatively well, while not imposing stringent computational requirements. [5] When the covariates are omitted from the analysis, the maximum likelihood boils down to the Kaplan-Meier estimator of the survivor function.
A concept closely-related but different [2] to instantaneous failure rate () is the hazard rate (or hazard function), (). In the many-system case, this is defined as the proportional failure rate of the systems still functioning at time t {\displaystyle t} (as opposed to f ( t ) {\displaystyle f(t)} , which is the expressed as a proportion of ...
In practice the odds ratio is commonly used for case-control studies, as the relative risk cannot be estimated. [1] In fact, the odds ratio has much more common use in statistics, since logistic regression, often associated with clinical trials, works with the log of the odds ratio, not relative risk. Because the (natural log of the) odds of a ...
If the hazard ratio is , there are total subjects, is the probability a subject in either group will eventually have an event (so that is the expected number of events at the time of the analysis), and the proportion of subjects randomized to each group is 50%, then the logrank statistic is approximately normal with mean () and variance 1. [4]