When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Relative risk - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relative_risk

    The relative risk (RR) or risk ratio is the ratio of the probability of an outcome in an exposed group to the probability of an outcome in an unexposed group. Together with risk difference and odds ratio , relative risk measures the association between the exposure and the outcome.

  3. Retrospective cohort study - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Retrospective_cohort_study

    Both the relative risk and odds ratio are relevant in retrospective cohort studies, but only the odds ratio can be used in case-control studies. Although most case-control studies are retrospective, they can also be prospective when the researcher still enrolls participants based on the occurrence of a disease as new cases occur. [citation needed]

  4. Hazard ratio - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hazard_ratio

    The hazard ratio would be 2, indicating a higher hazard of death from the treatment. For example, a scientific paper might use an HR to state something such as: "Adequate COVID-19 vaccination status was associated with significantly decreased risk for the composite of severe COVID-19 or mortality with a[n] HR of 0.20 (95% CI, 0.17–0.22)."

  5. Case–control study - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Case–control_study

    Subsequently, Cornfield [15] pointed out that, when the disease outcome of interest is rare, the odds ratio of exposure can be used to estimate the relative risk (see rare disease assumption). The validity of the odds ratio depends highly on the nature of the disease studied, on the sampling methodology and on the type of follow-up.

  6. Risk difference - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Risk_difference

    The risk difference (RD), excess risk, or attributable risk [1] is the difference between the risk of an outcome in the exposed group and the unexposed group. It is computed as I e − I u {\displaystyle I_{e}-I_{u}} , where I e {\displaystyle I_{e}} is the incidence in the exposed group, and I u {\displaystyle I_{u}} is the incidence in the ...

  7. Attributable fraction for the population - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attributable_fraction_for...

    For example, in 1953 Levin's paper estimated that lung cancer has a relative risk of 3.6–13.4 in smokers compared to non-smokers, and that the proportion of the population exposed to smoking was 0.5–0.96, resulting in the high AF p value of 0.56–0.92. [6]

  8. Rare disease assumption - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rare_disease_assumption

    and = / / = While the prevalence is only 9% (9/100), the odds ratio (OR) is equal to 11.3 and the relative risk (RR) is equal to 7.2. Despite fulfilling the rare disease assumption overall, the OR and RR can hardly be considered to be approximately the same. However, the prevalence in the exposed group is 40%, which means is not sufficiently small

  9. Number needed to harm - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Number_needed_to_harm

    It is defined as the inverse of the absolute risk increase, and computed as / (), where is the incidence in the treated (exposed) group, and is the incidence in the control (unexposed) group. [1] Intuitively, the lower the number needed to harm, the worse the risk factor, with 1 meaning that every exposed person is harmed.