Ads
related to: fcc consumer complaint form california superior courtpld-c-010-form.pdffiller.com has been visited by 1M+ users in the past month
uslegalforms.com has been visited by 100K+ users in the past month
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) administers a universal service program, as authorized by Congress in the Telecommunications Act of 1996.All telephone service customers in the United States pay a monthly fee, and the resulting Universal Service Fund is used by the FCC to subsidize discounts for financially disadvantaged subscribers, build network infrastructure in underserved areas ...
Federal Communications Commission v. Consumers' Research is a pending United States Supreme Court case about the constitutionality of the Universal Service Fund under the nondelegation doctrine . [ 1 ]
In order to create an actionable complaint pursuant to FCC rules, an individual with a home phone or a personal cell phone is required to specify details of the infraction to the FCC. Typically this includes facts such as when the call occurred, the phone number called, the calling organization, the goods or services being marketed, and whether ...
The court applied similar reasoning to the writ of prohibition the next year. [34] To avoid the obvious implication that nearly all California government agency decisions were now entirely immune from judicial review, the court held in 1939 that the writ of mandate could be used instead for that purpose. [34]
DirecTV says in its 10-page complaint that Disney is violating the FCC's good faith mandates by asking it to waive any legal claims on any anticompetitive actions, including its ongoing packaging ...
DirecTV’s complaint says in part, “The negotiations have stalled because Disney insists on bundling and penetration requirements that a federal district court judge in New York recently found ...
The FCC voted in April along party lines to reassume regulatory oversight of broadband internet and reinstate open internet rules adopted in 2015 that were rescinded under then-President Donald Trump.
Sable Communications of California v. Federal Communications Commission , 492 U.S. 115 (1989), was a United States Supreme Court case involving the definition of " indecent material" and whether it is protected under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution . [ 1 ]