When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Telephone call recording laws - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telephone_call_recording_laws

    Clark/Melongo on March 20, 2014, which struck down Illinois' two-party consent law, Illinois was a one-party consent state. [60] [61] However, the state legislature amended the statute and, as of December 30, 2014, Illinois is once again a two-party consent state for non-electronic communications. [40] [41]

  3. Smith v. Maryland - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smith_v._Maryland

    Smith v. Maryland, 442 U.S. 735 (1979), was a Supreme Court case holding that the installation and use of a pen register by the police to obtain information on a suspect's telephone calls was not a "search" within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, and hence no search warrant was required.

  4. Legality of recording by civilians - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legality_of_recording_by...

    Laws differ in the United States on how many parties must give their consent before a conversation may be recorded. In 38 states and the District of Columbia, conversations may be recorded if the person is party to the conversation, or if at least one of the people who are party to the conversation have given a third party consent to record the ...

  5. Maryland v. King - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maryland_v._King

    Maryland v. King, 569 U.S. 435 (2013), was a decision of the United States Supreme Court which held that a cheek swab of an arrestee's DNA is comparable to fingerprinting and therefore, a legal police booking procedure that is reasonable under the Fourth Amendment.

  6. Government of Maryland - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Government_of_Maryland

    The government of Maryland is conducted according to the Maryland Constitution.The United States is a federation; consequently, the government of Maryland, like the other 49 state governments, has exclusive authority over matters that lie entirely within the state's borders, except as limited by the Constitution of the United States.

  7. Warden v. Hayden - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warden_v._Hayden

    Warden v. Hayden, 387 U.S. 294 (1967), was a United States Supreme Court case that held that 'mere evidence' may be seized and held as evidence in a trial, allowing such evidence obtained in a search to be used.

  8. List of boundary cases of the United States Supreme Court

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_boundary_cases_of...

    New Jersey has sovereign authority over the filled land added to the original Island. New Jersey's exception to that portion of the Special Master's report concerning the Court's authority to adjust the original boundary line between the two States is sustained. The other exceptions of New Jersey and New York are overruled. Court membership

  9. Steagald v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steagald_v._United_States

    Steagald v. United States, 451 U.S. 204 (1981), is a United States Supreme Court case which held that, based on the Fourth Amendment, a police officer may not conduct a warrantless search of a third party's home in an attempt to apprehend the subject of an arrest warrant, absent consent or exigent circumstances.