Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The following table compares various features of each license and is a general guide to the terms and conditions of each license, based on seven subjects or categories. Recent tools like the European Commissions' Joinup Licensing Assistant, [ 10 ] makes possible the licenses selection and comparison based on more than 40 subjects or categories ...
BSD licenses are a family of permissive free software licenses, imposing minimal restrictions on the use and distribution of covered software. This is in contrast to copyleft licenses, which have share-alike requirements. The original BSD license was used for its namesake, the Berkeley Software Distribution (BSD), a Unix-like operating system ...
[7] California Western School of Law's newmediarights.com defined them as follows: "The 'BSD-like' licenses such as the BSD, MIT and Apache licenses are extremely permissive, requiring little more than attributing the original portions of the licensed code to the original developers in your own code and/or documentation." [1]
The Apache License is a permissive free software license written by the Apache Software Foundation (ASF). [4] It allows users to use the software for any purpose, to distribute it, to modify it, and to distribute modified versions of the software under the terms of the license, without concern for royalties .
The names FreeBSD and OpenBSD are references to software freedom: both in cost and open source. [30] NetBSD's name is a tribute to the Internet, which brought the original developers together. [31] The first BSD mascot was the BSD daemon, named after a common type of Unix software program, a daemon.
The Apache License is more comprehensive and explicit. The Apache Software Foundation wrote it for their Apache HTTP Server. Version 2, published in 2004, offers legal advantages over simple licenses and provides similar grants. [55] While the BSD and MIT licenses offer an implicit patent grant, [56] the Apache License includes a section on ...
Apache License: No Yes Yes Yes Yes OpenBSD, Solaris: Yes Yes No Yes Multi folder Maven not supported IntelliJ IDEA Community Edition Apache License v2.0: No Yes Yes Yes Yes FreeBSD, OpenBSD, Solaris: Yes No No No VSCodium: MIT License: Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No stack trace console. LunarVim (based on NeoVim) Apache License: Yes No No Yes Yes No No
The GPL requires any derivative work to also be released according to the GPL while the BSD license does not. Essentially, the BSD license's only requirement is to acknowledge the original authors, and poses no restrictions on how the source code may be used. As a result, BSD code can be used in proprietary software that only acknowledges the ...