When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Daily Mail - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daily_Mail

    In February 2017, pursuant to a formal community discussion, editors on the English Wikipedia banned the use of the Daily Mail as a source in most cases. [24] [25] [26] Its use as a reference is now "generally prohibited, especially when other more reliable sources exist", [16] [24] [248] and it can no longer be used as proof of notability. [24]

  3. Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/...

    In the 2017 RfC, the Daily Mail was the first source to be deprecated on Wikipedia, and the decision was challenged and reaffirmed in the 2019 RfC. There is consensus that the Daily Mail (including its online version, MailOnline ) is generally unreliable, and its use as a reference is generally prohibited, especially when other sources exist ...

  4. Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/2 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/...

    In the 2017 RfC, the Daily Mail was the first source to be deprecated on Wikipedia, and the decision was challenged and reaffirmed in the 2019 RfC. There is consensus that the Daily Mail (including its online version, MailOnline ) is generally unreliable, and its use as a reference is generally prohibited, especially when other sources exist ...

  5. Wikipedia : Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 255

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:DAILYMAIL2

    The bottom line is: the Daily Mail is not reliable. It should not be used as a reliable source. Some people in this argument bring up public trust or distrust; this is not relevant because facts are not the same as public opinion. The Daily Mail has done a good job of hoodwinking its audience into believing its crackpot hoaxes are good ...

  6. Wikipedia : Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 220

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:DAILYMAILRFC

    Make no mistake, The Daily Mail is a bad source. But in the realm of mass media, most sources of the junk food news variety seem very bad. And these can be published by supposedly reliable news outlets. I would much rather see this more firmly clarified in policy. The Daily Mail is a bad source, and everybody knows it. But other outlets, even ...

  7. Wikipedia:Deprecated sources - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deprecated_sources

    The Daily Mail may be used in rare cases in an about-self fashion. Some editors regard the Daily Mail as reliable historically, so old articles may be used in a historical context. (Note that dailymail.co.uk is not trustworthy as a source of past content that was printed in the Daily Mail.)

  8. MailOnline - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MailOnline

    MailOnline (also known as dailymail.co.uk and dailymail.com outside the UK) is the website of the Daily Mail, a tabloid newspaper in the United Kingdom, and of its sister paper The Mail on Sunday. MailOnline is a division of dmg media, which is owned by Daily Mail and General Trust plc.

  9. Wikipedia : Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 299

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:DAILYMAIL3

    I recently reverted a section on The Epoch Times (which itself is a deprecated source on WP) which cited three opinion articles on the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation's coverage