Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The trial court declared the contract enforceable and awarded Batsakis $750 plus interest and Batsakis appealed the judgment at which time the Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court's decision but modified the damages to $2,000 "with interest thereon at the rate of 8% per annum from April 2, 1942 and ordered that such judgment will bear ...
Fair food. You may be hard-pressed to find foods like cotton candy or funnel cake at your everyday eateries, but during the 24 days of the State Fair of Texas these fair foods are around every corner.
Consumer Watchdog, a non-profit group that has previously sounded alarms about FAIR's solvency, warned last year that California homeowners could be on the hook for a $1,000 to $3,700 surcharge ...
The California Commission on Judicial Performance is responsible for investigating complaints of judicial misconduct, judicial incapacity, and disciplining state judges, and is composed of 11 members, each appointed four-year terms: 3 judges appointed by the California Supreme Court, 4 members appointed by the governor (2 attorneys and 2 non ...
If you want to taste more fair foods on a budget, visit from 11 a.m. to 4 p.m. on Wednesday or Thursdays, when food vendors will have one food item on their menus for $4. Related articles AOL
The California Consumers Legal Remedies Act ("CLRA") is the name for California Civil Code §§ 1750 et seq. [1] The CLRA declares unlawful several "methods of competition and unfair or deceptive acts or practices undertaken by any person in a transaction intended to result or which results in the sale or lease of goods or services to any consumer". [2]
It decides to file for a deficiency judgment for the deficiency plus those sale costs. Unless state law prohibits it, the lender can pursue a total of $50,000. How can a deficiency judgment impact ...
Director General of Fair Trading v First National Bank plc [2001] UKHL 52 is the leading case on the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999.It was an action to test the fairness of clauses in loan agreements which secured a bank's commercial interest rates after a debtor that had defaulted and they had been to court to determine their repayment scheme.