When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Disclaimer of interest - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disclaimer_of_interest

    Under the common law, a person who disclaimed their interest would be treated as though they had died before the trust or will came into effect. This was a sensible option if the disclaiming party was an heir by descent, whose own children would then take in his place and without the imposition of a gift tax .

  3. Gift (law) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gift_(law)

    The donee must accept the gift in order for the property transfer to take place. [1] However, because people generally accept gifts, acceptance will be presumed, so long as the donee does not expressly reject the gift. [2] A rejection of the gift destroys the gift, so that a donee cannot revive a once-rejected gift by later accepting it.

  4. Ademption by satisfaction - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ademption_by_satisfaction

    These specific legacies are viewed by courts as unique and not able to be replaced with a lifetime gift of money or other property. [2] When the probate court determines that the doctrine applies to a lifetime gift made to a will beneficiary, the amount beneficiary's gift under the will is reduced by the amount the beneficiary has already received.

  5. The Supreme Court says it is adopting a code of ethics, but ...

    www.aol.com/news/supreme-court-says-adopting...

    The Supreme Court on Monday adopted its first code of ethics, in the face of sustained criticism over undisclosed trips and gifts from wealthy benefactors to some justices, but the code lacks a ...

  6. My wife refuses to accept a $250,000 gift from her rich aunt ...

    www.aol.com/finance/wife-refuses-accept-250-000...

    Carl’s wife, Maria, has a tumultuous relationship with her family. So, when her rich aunt offered the couple a $250,000 gift to help pay off their mortgage, Maria refused.. She believes there ...

  7. Bogardus v. Commissioner - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bogardus_v._Commissioner

    Bogardus v. Commissioner, 302 U.S. 34 (1937), was a United States Supreme Court case discussing, under United States tax law, how to distinguish compensation from tax-exempt gifts under § 102(a). [1] It is notable (and thus appears frequently in law school casebooks) for the following holdings:

  8. Supreme Court wipes out anti-corruption law that bars ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/supreme-court-wipes-anti...

    The Supreme Court on Wednesday struck down part of a federal anti-corruption law that makes it a crime for state and local officials to take gifts valued at more than $5,000 from a donor who had ...

  9. Foreign Emoluments Clause - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foreign_Emoluments_Clause

    The Foreign Emoluments Clause is a provision in Article I, Section 9, Clause 8 of the United States Constitution, [1] that prohibits the federal government from granting titles of nobility, and restricts members of the federal government from receiving gifts, emoluments, offices or titles from foreign states and monarchies without the consent of the United States Congress.