When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Insurrection Act of 1807 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Insurrection_Act_of_1807

    The Insurrection Act of 1807 is a United States federal law [1] that empowers the president of the United States to deploy the U.S. military and federalized National Guard troops within the United States in particular circumstances, such as to suppress civil disorder, insurrection, or rebellion.

  3. Can Trump be on the ballot in 2024? It can hinge on the ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/trump-ballot-2024-hinge-meaning...

    Ronald Fein, an attorney for the group Free Speech For People, which is representing the petitioners, said an insurrection against the Constitution is “a concerted, forcible effort to prevent or ...

  4. Opinion: What this judge said about Trump is bone-chilling - AOL

    www.aol.com/opinion-judge-said-trump-bone...

    At the time the 14th Amendment was ratified, an insurrection was “understood to refer to any public use of force or threat of force by a group of people to hinder or prevent the execution of law ...

  5. Supreme Court justices steer clear of insurrection question ...

    www.aol.com/supreme-court-justices-steer-clear...

    An insurrection, he added, “needs to be an organized, concerted effort to overthrow the government of the United States through violence.” Jackson appeared incredulous at the narrow definition ...

  6. Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourteenth_Amendment_to...

    Some legal scholars speculated that a court would be required to make a final determination that Trump was disqualified under Section 3. [209] [240] [241] The U.S. Supreme Court had never ruled on the meaning or application of the insurrection clause. Legal experts expected at least one of these state cases to be appealed to the Supreme Court.

  7. Trump v. Anderson - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trump_v._Anderson

    The Colorado Supreme Court found it unnecessary to define insurrection, instead holding that "it suffices for us to conclude that any definition of 'insurrection' for purposes of Section Three would encompass a concerted and public use of force or threat of force by a group of people to hinder or prevent the U.S. government from taking the ...

  8. Kansas AG Kobach tells U.S. Supreme Court: ‘Trump did not ...

    www.aol.com/kansas-ag-kobach-tells-u-110000000.html

    In the amicus brief from more than 177 Republican lawmakers, Cruz also argues that the Colorado Supreme Court’s definition of insurrection would open up a tit-for-tat response, in which he ...

  9. Aftermath of the January 6 United States Capitol attack

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aftermath_of_the_January_6...

    Naunihal Singh of the U.S. Naval War College, and author of Seizing Power: The Strategic Logic of Military Coups, wrote that the attack on the Capitol was "an insurrection, a violent uprising against the government" and "sedition", but not a coup because Trump did not order the military "to seize power on his behalf".