Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
BCE Inc v 1976 Debentureholders, 2008 SCC 69 (CanLII), [2008] 3 SCR 560 [2] is a leading decision of the Supreme Court of Canada on the nature of the duties of corporate directors to act in the best interests of the corporation, "viewed as a good corporate citizen".
In BCE Inc v 1976 Debentureholders, the Supreme Court of Canada stated that, in assessing a claim of oppression, a court must answer two questions: [13]. Does the evidence support the reasonable expectation asserted by the claimant?
See BCE Inc v 1976 Debentureholders for further information). Due to the tightening of the credit market caused by the subprime mortgage crisis , the investment banks financing the deal – led by Citigroup , Deutsche Bank and the Royal Bank of Scotland – started negotiations on May 16, 2008, to revise the terms of their loans with greater ...
A detailed examination of the Court's language [in BCE Inc. v. 1976 Debentureholders] reveals that the duty of directors in Canada to 'act honestly and in good faith with a view to the best interests of the corporation' is an implied three-part fiduciary duty, which operationalizes the principle of fair treatment. [42]
R v Rodrigue: 2005 SCC 67 Forum des maires de la Péninsule acadienne v Canada (Food Inspection Agency) 2005 SCC 85 R v Hazout: 2006 SCC 42 BCE Inc v 1976 Debentureholders: 2008 SCC 69 Nature of the duties of corporate directors in Canadian law. R v Ahmad: 2011 SCC 6
BCE Inc v 1976 Debentureholders, [2008] 3 S.C.R. 560, 2008 SCC 69 ... Apotex Inc v Sanofi‑Synthelabo Canada Inc, [2008] 3 S.C.R. 265, 2008 SCC 61
BCE Inc v 1976 Debentureholders; C. Canadian Aero Service Ltd v O'Malley; R v Canadian Dredge & Dock Co; D. Deloitte & Touche v Livent Inc (Receiver of)
Central Trust Co v Rafuse; Century Services Inc v Canada (AG) Chamberlain v Surrey School District No 36; Chandos Construction Ltd v Deloitte Restructuring Inc; Chaoulli v Quebec (AG) Charkaoui v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) Charlebois v Saint John (City of) Chartier v Chartier; R. v. Chaulk; Cherneskey v Armadale Publishers Ltd