When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Rogerian argument - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rogerian_argument

    A key principle of Rogerian argument is that, instead of advocating one's own position and trying to refute the other's position, one tries to state the other's position with as much care as one would have stated one's own position, emphasizing what is strong or valid in the other's argument. [4]

  3. Social commentary - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_commentary

    Social commentary is the act of using rhetorical means to provide commentary on social, cultural, political, or economic issues in a society. This is often done with the idea of implementing or promoting change by informing the general populace about a given problem and appealing to people's sense of justice.

  4. Reflective practice - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reflective_practice

    Johns highlights the importance of experienced knowledge and the ability of a practitioner to access, understand and put into practice information that has been acquired through empirical means. Reflection occurs through "looking in" on one's thoughts and emotions and "looking out" at the situation experienced.

  5. Intentional stance - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intentional_stance

    The intentional stance is a term coined by philosopher Daniel Dennett for the level of abstraction in which we view the behavior of an entity in terms of mental properties.It is part of a theory of mental content proposed by Dennett, which provides the underpinnings of his later works on free will, consciousness, folk psychology, and evolution.

  6. Rhetorical stance - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhetorical_stance

    Rhetorical stance is the position or perspective that a writer or speaker adopts to convey a message to an audience. [ 1 ] It involves choices in tone, style, and language to persuade, inform, entertain, or engage the audience.

  7. Kuhn–Popper debate - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kuhn–Popper_debate

    The Kuhn-Popper debate was a debate surrounding research methods and the advancement of scientific knowledge. In 1965, at the University of London's International Colloquium in the Philosophy of Science, Thomas Kuhn and Karl Popper engaged in a debate that circled around three main areas of disagreement. [1]

  8. Anti-intellectualism - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-intellectualism

    Culturally, the ideal American was the self-made man whose knowledge derived from life-experience, not an intellectual man whose knowledge of the real world was derived from books, formal education, and academic study; thus, the justified anti-intellectualism reported in The New Purchase, or Seven and a Half Years in the Far West (1843), the ...

  9. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/An_Essay_Concerning_Human...

    Locke discusses the limit of human knowledge, and whether such can be said to be accurate or truthful. Thus, there is a distinction between what an individual might claim to know, as part of a system of knowledge, and whether or not that claimed knowledge is actual. Locke writes at the beginning of the fourth chapter ("Of the Reality of ...