Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Olympic Airways v. Husain, 540 U.S. 644 (2004), was a United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS) case related to Olympic Airways Flight 417. The case arose from the death on January 4, 1998 of Dr. Abid Hanson, [1] a passenger on Olympic Airways Flight 417 from Cairo, Egypt, via Athens, Greece, to New York City in the United States.
[26] [27] The Federal Court in Melbourne ordered a $5.5 million penalty against Japan Airlines International Co Ltd (JAL) for breaching the price fixing provisions of the Trade Practices Act 1974*. JAL admitted to making and giving effect to illegal price fixing understandings with other international airlines that each of them would impose a ...
The amounts were paid pursuant to agreements which entitled the respondents to recover the moneys, together with interest, if it were to be held that, as against the respondents, the liens did not validly secure payment of the charges, or for any reason the liens, or the charges, or both, were, in whole or in part, illegal, void or unenforceable.
Air travellers are being failed as no airlines have been fined due to regulatory action in 20 years despite numerous cases of “unlawful” behaviour, according to a consumer group.
The case is part of a broader legal effort against four budget airlines, with potential compensation reaching up to 10 billion euros Image credits: Niklas Jeromin
The FAA has referred 80 cases of unruly travelers for possible prosecution in the past year, officials said Wednesday, part of what was a dramatic spike in on-b
Delta Airlines Inc. case may serve as an example of how legal action can impact the airline industry's advertising practices, regulatory landscape, and consumer awareness concerning carbon neutrality if this case continues in court, either way it goes. Airlines may need to adapt to a changing environment where the accuracy of their ...
A number of airlines agreed to set up a clearing house to manage debt and credit accounts among themselves. Each airline in the group owed multiple and changing debts to one another, so to make settlements easier, participants were not meant to claim against one another, but simply enter their transactions in the clearing house, and then settle the balance at the end of each month.