When.com Web Search

  1. Ad

    related to: sarbanes oxley violation examples

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Sarbanes–Oxley Act - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SarbanesOxley_Act

    The SarbanesOxley Act of 2002 is a United States federal law that mandates certain practices in financial record keeping and reporting for corporations.The act, Pub. L. 107–204 (text), 116 Stat. 745, enacted July 30, 2002, also known as the "Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection Act" (in the Senate) and "Corporate and Auditing Accountability, Responsibility, and ...

  3. Obstructing an official proceeding - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obstructing_an_official...

    Corruptly obstructing, influencing, or impeding an official proceeding is a felony under U.S. federal law. It was enacted as part of the SarbanesOxley Act of 2002 in reaction to the Enron scandal, and closed a legal loophole on who could be charged with evidence tampering by defining the new crime very broadly.

  4. Fischer v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fischer_v._United_States

    United States, 603 U.S. ___, was a United States Supreme Court case about the proper use of the felony charge of obstructing an official proceeding, established in the SarbanesOxley Act, against participants in the January 6 United States Capitol attack. The Supreme Court ruled 6–3 in June of 2024 that the charge only applied when the ...

  5. Fraud Files: How Well Does Sarbanes-Oxley Reduce Fraud ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/2010-07-16-fraud-files-how-well...

    Yet there is no real evidence that fraud risk or actual fraud has been reduced because of Sarbanes-Oxley. The news this week surrounds Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This section ...

  6. London Whale Settlement Sets Legal Precedent - AOL

    www.aol.com/2013/09/27/london-whale-settlement...

    JPMorgan Chase settled charges last week with a number of federal regulators in connection with the London Whale fiasco. The big bank will pony up $920 million in penalties to the Securities ...

  7. Yates v. United States (2015) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yates_v._United_States_(2015)

    Yates v. United States, 574 U.S. 528 (2015), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court construed 18 U.S.C. § 1519, a provision added to the federal criminal code by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, to criminalize the destruction or concealment of "any record, document, or tangible object" to obstruct a federal investigation. [1]

  8. Murray v. UBS Securities, LLC - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murray_v._UBS_Securities,_LLC

    In August 2012, Murray filed a claim with the Department of Labor alleging that his employment was terminated in retaliation because of his whistleblowing, in violation of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. After 180 days, his complaint lapsed, and Murray exercised his right to file a de novo action in the United States District Court for the Southern ...

  9. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_Company_Accounting...

    The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) is a nonprofit corporation created by the SarbanesOxley Act of 2002 to oversee the audits of US-listed public companies. The PCAOB also oversees the audits of broker-dealers , including compliance reports filed pursuant to federal securities laws, to promote investor protection.