Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The Journal of Biophotonics is a monthly peer-reviewed scientific journal covering research on the interactions between light and biological material. It was established in 2008 by Jürgen Popp (Friedrich Schiller University Jena), Gert von Bally (Muenster, Germany), and Andreas Thoss (Berlin, Germany).
The impact factor (IF) or journal impact factor (JIF) of an academic journal is a scientometric index calculated by Clarivate that reflects the yearly mean number of citations of articles published in the last two years in a given journal, as indexed by Clarivate's Web of Science.
Download as PDF; Printable version; ... This page was last edited on 8 August 2024, at 14:03 (UTC). ... List of bioinformatics journals.
Chinese Journal of Chemical Physics: Chin. J. Chem. Phys. Chinese Physical Society: 1988–present ISSN 1674-0068 (print) ISSN 2327-2244 (web) International Journal of Fluid Engineering: Int. J. Fluid Eng. Hefei General Machinery Research Institute 2024–present ISSN 2994-9009 (print) ISSN 2994-9017 (web) Journal of Laser Applications: J ...
This is a list of physics journals with existing articles on Wikipedia. ... Journal of Biophotonics; ... This page was last edited on 5 January 2024, ...
The impact factor (IF) or journal impact factor (JIF) of an academic journal is a scientometric index calculated by Clarivate that reflects the yearly mean number of citations of articles published in the last two years in a given journal, as indexed by Clarivate's Web of Science.
The impact factor of Chinese scientific journals is relatively low. In 1999, the top-cited journal—Mining and Geologica Sinica—had an impact factor of 1.487, and the average number of citations per article published in the Chinese journals covered by Science Citation Index was 0.326. One reason for the low impact factor is that Chinese ...
IC's journal ranking system was criticized in 2013 by Jeffrey Beall because of the alleged high proportion of predatory journals included in it and its suspect evaluation methodology; he characterized the resulting "IC Value" as "a pretty worthless measure". [1] Index Copernicus remains on the list of misleading metrics. [2]