When.com Web Search

  1. Ad

    related to: purdue owl evaluating sources

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Online Writing Lab - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Online_Writing_Lab

    Purdue University, in West Lafayette, Indiana, launched the first OWL, in 1994. Its OWL is freely available online to all, and includes handouts, specific subject information, resources geared towards students in grades 7–12, [ 1 ] and citation formatting help with MLA, APA and other forms.

  3. Annotated bibliography - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Annotated_bibliography

    They show a summary of the source content; They highlight the arguments and proofs/evidence mentioned in the work; They sometimes describe the author's methodology and any theories used; They offer the conclusion of the source; They do not evaluate the work they are discussing; Informative Annotations. This type of annotation is a summary of ...

  4. Source criticism - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Source_criticism

    Source criticism (or information evaluation) is the process of evaluating an information source, i.e.: a document, a person, a speech, a fingerprint, a photo, an observation, or anything used in order to obtain knowledge. In relation to a given purpose, a given information source may be more or less valid, reliable or relevant.

  5. Wikipedia:Evaluating sources - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Evaluating_sources

    Sources of information are commonly categorized as primary, secondary, or tertiary sources.In brief, a primary source is one close to the event with firsthand knowledge (for example, an eyewitness); a secondary source is at least one step removed (for example, a book about an event written by someone not involved in it); and a tertiary source is an encyclopaedia or textbook that provides a ...

  6. Wikipedia : WikiProject WikiFundi Content/Help:Evaluating ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject...

    Copying words, structure, or phrases from the original source — even when cited to that source — violates Wikipedia’s copyright policies and is a form of plagiarism. The best way to avoid this is to find information from a variety of good sources, make sure you really understand the information, and then write it using your own words.

  7. MLA Handbook - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MLA_Handbook

    MLA Handbook grew out of the initial MLA Style Sheet of 1951 [5] (revised in 1970 [6] [7]), a 28-page "more or less official" standard. [8] The first five editions, published between 1977 and 1999 were titled MLA Handbook for Writers of Research Papers, Theses, and Dissertations.

  8. Woozle effect - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Woozle_effect

    The Woozle effect, also known as evidence by citation, [1] occurs when a source is widely cited for a claim that the source does not adequately support, giving said claim undeserved credibility. If results are not replicated and no one notices that a key claim was never well-supported in its original publication, faulty assumptions may affect ...

  9. CRAAP test - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CRAAP_test

    The CRAAP test is a test to check the objective reliability of information sources across academic disciplines. CRAAP is an acronym for Currency, Relevance, Authority, Accuracy, and Purpose. [1] Due to a vast number of sources existing online, it can be difficult to tell whether these sources are trustworthy to use as tools for research.