Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Insignia of the Supreme Court of India The Supreme Court of India, in New Delhi. The Supreme Court of India is the highest court in the country. The maximum possible strength is 34. According to the Constitution of India, the judges of the Supreme Court must retire at the age of 65. [1] There are currently 33 judges (including the Chief Justice ...
The Supreme Court of India was constituted as per Chapter IV of Part V of the Constitution of India. The fourth Chapter of the Indian Constitution is " The Union Judiciary". Under this Chapter, the Supreme Court of India is vested with all Jurisdiction. As per Article 124, The Supreme Court of India had been Constituted and Established.
Vikram Nath (born 24 September 1962) is a judge of the Supreme Court of India. He is a former chief justice of the Gujarat High Court [ 1 ] [ 2 ] and former judge of the Allahabad High Court . He was earlier recommended as chief justice of the Andhra Pradesh High Court but the centre disapproved the recommendations. [ 3 ]
Sanjiv Khanna, the incumbent chief justice of India, since 11 November 2024 The chief justice of India is the highest-ranking officer of the Indian judiciary and the chief judge of the Supreme Court of India. As head of the Supreme Court, the chief justice is responsible for the allocation of cases and appointment of constitutional benches which deal with important matters of law. In ...
The Phase-II of the Project [3] has been approved by the e-Committee of Supreme Court of India in January 2014 [4] for further enhancement of ICT enablement of Courts with a broad objective of: Computerization of more than 8000 new courts, legal service authority offices, and state judicial academies with strengthened hardware.
Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!
Consequently, the court directed local authorities to monitor the petitioner under the provisions of the Mental Health Act. [6] On 14 October 2024, the Delhi High Court bench, comprising Manmohan and Gedela, criticised a Wikipedia page dedicated to the defamation lawsuit filed by Asian News International (ANI) against the Wikimedia Foundation (WMF
Musk and Ramaswamy cited Supreme Court rulings in two recent cases that sharply curbed the power of executive agencies as a “mandate” from the justices to cut back regulations.