Ads
related to: ubuntu vs windows security comparison test
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Note that in addition to the below table, block capabilities can be implemented below the file system layer in Linux (LVM, integritysetup, cryptsetup) or Windows (Volume Shadow Copy Service, SECURITY), etc.
A number of computer operating systems employ security features to help prevent malicious software from gaining sufficient privileges to compromise the computer system. . Operating systems lacking such features, such as DOS, Windows implementations prior to Windows NT (and its descendants), CP/M-80, and all Mac operating systems prior to Mac OS X, had only one category of user who was allowed ...
Only Windows MBR volumes; no UEFI GPT drives, and dynamic drives discouraged Yes Name Hidden containers Pre-boot authentication Single sign-on Custom authentication Multiple keys Passphrase strengthening Hardware acceleration TPM Filesystems Two-factor authentication ZzEnc No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Windows, Legacy BIOS & UEFI
Name License Source model Target uses Status Platforms Apache Mynewt: Apache 2.0: open source: embedded: active: ARM Cortex-M, MIPS32, Microchip PIC32, RISC-V: BeRTOS: Modified GNU GPL: open source
Organizational differences may be motivated by historical reasons. Other criteria include security, including how quickly security upgrades are available; ease of package management; and number of packages available. These tables compare notable distribution's latest stable release on wide-ranging objective criteria.
Comparison of user features of operating systems refers to a comparison of the general user features of major operating systems in a narrative format. It does not encompass a full exhaustive comparison or description of all technical details of all operating systems. It is a comparison of basic roles and the most prominent features.