Ads
related to: court cases involving intellectual property protection of video games- Get Attorneys Assistance
Talk to a Trademark Specialist
Fast & Easy Trademark Process
- File Your Trademark Today
100% Approval Guaranteed
Limited Time Offer
- Apply For Registration
Fast & Easy Online Process
Same Day Filing
- USA #1 Trademark™ Filer
Get Your Federal USA Trademark
Trademark Filing Made Easy
- Get Attorneys Assistance
courtrec.com has been visited by 100K+ users in the past month
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The case was subsequently settled out of court, with Spry Fox gaining ownership of the Yeti Town property by the end of 2012. [11] Since these cases in 2012, legal scholars have found that courts have been more scrutinizing of look-and-feel in cases involving video game clones. [18]
[4] [5] The court refused to grant an injunction against Activision, and the two companies settled out of court in 1982, leading to the first official third-party video games for the Atari VCS. [5] [6] Soon after, the United States saw the proliferation of video game consoles, as well as many low-quality games produced by third-party developers ...
Sony drew support from fellow video game hardware manufacturers Nintendo, Sega, and 3dfx Interactive, while Connectix was backed by fellow software firms and trade associations. [2] The district court awarded Sony an injunction blocking Connectix from copying or using the Sony BIOS code in the development of the Virtual Game Station for Windows ...
Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Association, 564 U.S. 786 (2011), was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court that struck down a 2005 California law banning the sale of certain violent video games to children without parental supervision.
In this instance, Saber Interactive held exclusive rights to depict the K-700 tractor in its game Mudrunner, yet Oovee used the same vehicle in its competing game, Spintires. The court found that video games are expressive works deserving of First Amendment protection and that Oovee’s use of the K-700 did not infringe on Saber’s trademarks.
The case was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, which ruled in favor of Sega and issued an injunction against Accolade preventing them from publishing any more games for the Genesis and requiring them to recall all the existing Genesis games they had for sale. Accolade appealed the decision to the Ninth ...
The Galoob decision continues to influence legal discussions of fair use of copyrighted video game content, such as how to apply the principle of permanency to a live stream or Let's Play. [22] By deterring companies from being overly litigious, the case was essential to the future of video game modding in the United States and globally. [3]
Settled outside of court, 1990: Case history; Prior actions: Letter of Request from Nintendo to Blockbuster, requesting cessation of manual reproduction. Court membership; Judge sitting: Alfred M. Wolin: Case opinions; The photocopying of video game manuals was an infringement of copyright, but the rental of video games was completely legal.