Ad
related to: san francisco epa lawsuit
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
City and County of San Francisco v. Environmental Protection Agency is a pending United States Supreme Court case about whether the Clean Water Act allows the Environmental Protection Agency (or an authorized state) to impose generic prohibitions in National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permits that subject permit-holders to enforcement for violating water quality standards without ...
In siding with the EPA in the San Francisco case last year, the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals relied in part on that precedent. The Clean Water Act, enacted in 1972, allows the EPA to set clear ...
Stonewalling leads to a lawsuit. ... the right-leaning judges in their tracks when he sketched the real-world impact of their gutting the Clean Water Act as San Francisco wants. The EPA in 14 days ...
Lawyers for San Francisco told the court it was 'unfair and unworkable' to hold the city potentially liable for huge fines because of polluted water along Pacific beaches near the city.
In 2024, Melgar introduced a Resolution urging the City of San Francisco to settle their lawsuit with the Environmental Protection Agency in order to avoid sending the case to the Supreme Court of the United States and risk weakening the Clean Water Act.
In one case, anti-abortion activists filed a CEQA lawsuit to try to block a new tenant (Planned Parenthood) from using an already constructed office building in South San Francisco. They cited the noise caused by their own protests as the environmental impact requiring mitigation. This lawsuit delayed the new tenancy by at least 18 months.
State. Sen Scott Wiener, D-San Francisco, authored SB 253, a bill signed in ... according to the EPA, ... the California Chamber of Commerce filed a lawsuit against SB 253, citing First Amendment ...
In June 2015, a lawsuit was filed against the Environmental Protection Agency to prevent the approval of the station's air-emissions permit; the suit was dismissed in October of that year. As of 2015, the only recorded injury that had ever occurred at the facility was in April 2009, when an employee tripped and chipped a tooth.