Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Sergeant Jatonya Clayborn Muldrow maintains that her employer, the St. Louis Police Department, transferred her from one job to another because she is a woman. She sued the City of St. Louis under Title VII, alleging that she had suffered sex discrimination with respect to the “terms [or] conditions” of her employment.
The court issued a ruling in Muldrow v. City of St. Louis holding that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act bars employers from discriminating in decisions like lateral transfers, without requiring employees to show that the discriminatory decision caused “significant” disadvantage.
After her transfer, Sergeant Muldrow was asked to return FBI-issued equipment, which she did, and her Task Force Officer status was revoked. She filed a discrimination charge with the Missouri Commission on Human Rights against the City of St. Louis and Captain Deeba, later filing an action in Missouri state court alleging Title VII violations.
Muldrow sued Respondent the City of St. Louis (“City”) in Missouri state court, alleging gender discrimination and retaliation for her reports of discriminatory practices, both in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”).
Muldrow v. City of St. Louis (Docket 22-193) was a United States Supreme Court decision which held that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 protected against discriminatory job transfers, even where the transfer did not result in a significant disadvantage.
Supreme Court Decision - Muldrow v. City of St. Louis. Updated April 17, 2024. Civil Rights Division. U.S. Department of Justice. 950 Pennsylvania Avenue NW. Office of the Assistant Attorney General, Main. Washington DC 20530.
Muldrow v. City of St. Louis, Missouri. Holding: An employee challenging a job transfer under Title VII must show that the transfer brought about some harm with respect to an identifiable term or condition of employment, but that harm need not be significant.
v. ST. LOUIS Opinion of the Court Justice Kagan delivered the opinion of the Court. Sergeant Jatonya Clayborn Muldrow maintains that her employer, the St. Louis Police Department, transferred her from one job to another because she is a woman. She sued the City of St. Louis under Title VII, alleging that she had
The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including August 28, 2023. The time to file respondents' brief on the merits is extended to and including October 11, 2023. Aug 28 2023. Brief of petitioner Jatonya Clayborn Muldrow filed.
Sergeant Jatonya Clayborn Muldrow, a police officer in the St. Louis Police Department, alleged that she was transferred from her position in the Intelligence Division to a uniformed job in another department because of her gender.