Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Luke 12 is the 12th chapter of the Gospel of Luke in the New Testament of the Christian Bible. It records a number of teachings and parables told by Jesus Christ when "an innumerable multitude of people had gathered together", but addressed "first of all" to his disciples .
[2] Even though there may be general signs that precede Jesus' Second Coming, the exact time is unknown. [2] This is a theme which has also been discussed earlier in Luke 12. [3] The reference to a wedding banquet in Luke 12:36 suggests a heavenly banquet, [3] and recalls the parable of the Ten Virgins, which follows this parable in Matthew.
Matthew and Mark report the cursing of the fig tree, [12] [13] a single incident, despite some substantial differences of wording and content. In Luke, the only parable of the barren fig tree [14] is in a different point of the narrative. Some would say that Luke has extensively adapted an element of the triple tradition, while others would ...
For example, according to Luke 2:11 Jesus was the Christ at his birth, but in Acts 2:36 he becomes Christ at the resurrection, while in Acts 3:20 it seems his messiahship is active only at the parousia, the "second coming"; similarly, in Luke 2:11 he is the Saviour from birth, but in Acts 5:31 [47] he is made Saviour at the resurrection; and he ...
While the periods to which the gospels are usually dated suggest otherwise, [2] [3] convention traditionally holds that the authors were two of the Twelve Apostles of Jesus, John and Matthew, as well as two "apostolic men", [4] Mark and Luke, whom Orthodox Tradition records as members of the 70 Apostles :
Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!
Luke 3 is the third chapter of the Gospel of Luke in the New ... [12] Like Mark 1:2–3, ... Meyer reads the text as meaning that whilst the assembled people ...
A number of scholars have suggested a Three-source hypothesis, that Luke actually did make some use of Matthew after all. This allows much more flexibility in the reconstruction of Q. Dunn proposes an Oral Q hypothesis, in which Q is not a document but a body of oral teachings. [12]