Ad
related to: the ethics of ambiguity pdf
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The Ethics of Ambiguity (French: Pour une morale de l'ambiguïté) is Simone de Beauvoir's second major non-fiction work. It was prompted by a lecture she gave in 1945, where she claimed that it was impossible to base an ethical system on her partner Jean-Paul Sartre 's major philosophical work Being and Nothingness ( French : L'Être et le ...
Download as PDF; Printable version; ... Ambiguity is the type of meaning in which a phrase, ... Simone de Beauvoir tries to base an ethics on Heidegger's and Sartre's ...
Download as PDF; Printable version; In other projects Wikidata item; ... The Ethics of Ambiguity; Existential Physics; Existentialism Is a Humanism; F. Fear and ...
Ethics and Language; The Ethics of Ambiguity; The Ethics of Diet; The Ethics of Immigration; The Ethics of Liberty; Ethics Since 1900; Ethics, Institutions, and the Right to Philosophy; Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong; Ethics: Origin and Development; Ethik in der Schauweise der Wissenschaften vom Menschen und von der Gesellschaft; Eudemian Ethics
Ethics of Resistance: Instead of seeking to affirm any absolute good, Dalton proposes developing an "ethics of resistance," which "resists" any given concept of the absolute good. [6] For Dalton, ethical action is grounded in recognizing and resisting the allure of the absolute, wherever and however it appears.
Seven Types of Ambiguity ushered in New Criticism in the United States. The book is a guide to a style of literary criticism practiced by Empson. An ambiguity is represented as a puzzle to Empson. We have ambiguity when "alternative views might be taken without sheer misreading." Empson reads poetry as an exploration of conflicts within the author.
Interview by Gary Brewer, "Michelle Fierro: The Ethics of Ambiguity", Art and Cake, May 20, 2017; David Pagel, "In Michelle Fierro's painting, mistakes lead only to possibility", Los Angeles Times, February 24, 2017
Maxmin expected utility: Axiomatized by Gilboa and Schmeidler [8] is a widely received alternative to utility maximization, taking into account ambiguity-averse preferences. This model reconciles the notion that intuitive decisions may violate the ambiguity neutrality, established within both the Ellsberg Paradox and Allais Paradox.